Every time I think false teacher Chuck “Jesus is not the only way” Currie can’t top his earlier hypocrisy and falsehoods, he proves me wrong. Chuck is pro-legalized abortion and wants taxpayer-funded abortions but hypocritically mentions Jesus’ concern for the “least of these” in many of his posts.
But he really shows how pro-abortion he is in “Fake Clinics: Stop Preying on Women.” You see, if someone was truly pro-choice — and especially if that someone claimed to be a Christian — he would support Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPCs). They do many great things for women and families in need, all for free. Most take zero government funding and rely solely on contributions and many volunteer hours. I expect Planned Parenthood to hate CPCs. After all, if you make money by killing babies then anyone with a pro-life mission is your sworn enemy. But even pro-choicers should support CPCs.
So how about the claims made in Currie’s post? First, make no mistake: People who make lots of money killing babies don’t mind lying to protect their business. Really! And it is a very, very well documented fact that Planned Parenthood hides statutory rape. Why doesn’t Chuck blog about that?
I wonder if Chuck’s opinion of Planned Parenthood would change if his daughters became clients? History shows that if they were 13 and pregnant by 27 yr. old men that Planned Parenthood would not report the statutory rape and would coach them to lie about it. Oh, and they would kill his grandchildren — for a large fee, of course.
Most parents would go nuts over that. Then again, Chuck the moral freak proudly takes his young girls to gay pride prides. What a Romans 1 poster boy.
Now to fisk Chuck’s lies and bad reasoning:
A common misperception is that the “Christian position’ on abortion is anti-choice.
Yes, we are anti-choice to crush and dismember innocent human beings. Like most pro-abortionists, Chuck just doesn’t know how to finish his sentences.
Double fallacy: No one opposes women making “health care decisions.” We do oppose women killing their unborn children, who are distinct human beings. What about health care for the unborn, Chuck? Why don’t you support their right to make decisions?
I recognize that the issue of abortion is a difficult one and that good people can come to very different conclusions concerning this issue.
But why is it difficult, Chuck? Please explain. I know why it is wrong: Abortion kills an innocent human being.
My own belief is that government shouldn’t be in the business of making these kinds of decisions for women. Women should have a choice.
Tired old fallacious sound bites. Chuck, should women have a choice to kill their toddlers? You want the government to make all sorts of decisions for our lives. Shouldn’t the primary role of government be to protect human beings? The government wouldn’t making a choice for the woman, it would be making a choice to protect innocent human life and protect the “least of these.”
The General Synod of the United Church of Christ has said:
Whereas, women and men must make decisions about unplanned or unwanted pregnancies that involve their physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being; and …Whereas, abortion is a social justice issue, both for parents dealing with pregnancy and parenting under highly stressed circumstances, as well as for our society as a whole;
Yes, it is a social justice issue: You shouldn’t kill innocent human beings.
Therefore, be it resolved, that the Sixteenth General Synod:
- affirms the sacredness of all life, and the need to protect and defend human life in particular;
But if the life of the unborn is sacred, why not protect it? There is no question that it is a human life.
- encourages persons facing unplanned pregnancies to consider giving birth and parenting the child, or releasing the child for adoption, before abortion;
- upholds the right of men and women to have access to adequately funded family planning services, and to safe, legal abortions as one option among others;
Please explain how an abortion can ever be safe for the unborn human being.
- urges the United Church of Christ, at all levels, to provide educational resources and programs to persons, especially young persons, to help reduce the incidence of unplanned and unwanted pregnancies, and to encourage responsible approaches to sexual behavior.
A reporter from The New York Times who recently visited a Crisis Pregnancy Center notes that she was provided with a pamphlet “about the risks of abortion” that “mentioned breast cancer, a link the National Cancer Institute has refuted, and something called post-abortion syndrome, for which the American Psychological Association, among others, says there is no evidence. As for the physical risks of pregnancy and childbirth? There was no pamphlet to discuss them.”
Gosh, the NCI and the APA would never buckle to political pressure, would they? And people who kill babies for a profitable living would never lie about it would they?
Hey, come to think of it, Chuck is a well documented, serial, unrepentant liar. Since when did he get so passionate about the truth? Oh, when it advances the pro-abortion cause.
And Chuck obviously has never met many post-abortive women. Of course, in his “Christian” counseling he’d tell them that killing their unborn children was blessed by Jesus. What blasphemy!
Some authentic Christians might be pro-choice, though they are deeply, wildly, embarrassingly on the wrong side of the issue and almost universally uninformed about the key issues. One day they will deeply regret that their laziness and refusal to be involved were the reasons abortion was made and kept legal. But you can know for sure that nearly 100% of Christians who oppose CPCs are fake.
CPCs save lives today and for eternity. Fake Christians like Chuck and Co. are tools of Satan trying to destroy lives today and for eternity.