Tag Archives: False teachers

Bible, False teachers

Opposites

Leave a comment

One of my irritations with the “Christian” Left and their theology is that it pretends to be slightly different from orthodox Christianity while it is usually 180 degrees off when it comes to the essentials of the faith and any current hot topics.  Please note that by “Leftist theology,” I don’t mean the theology of political liberals.  I am referring to people who call themselves Christians but deny the essentials of the historic faith (i.e., the kinds of things countless martyrs died for — Jesus’ divinity and exclusivity, the authority of scripture, etc.) and are indistinguishable from the world on sexual ethics.  If you want to debate the disputable matters, go right ahead.  I’m flexible on those.  But words mean things, and far too many people use the term Christian in error.

For example, claiming that Jesus is one of many paths to God isn’t a little different than saying He is the only way; it is the opposite.  There is either one way, or there is not one way.  The Bible has over 100 passages teaching directly or indirectly that Jesus is the only way to salvation.  If you don’t agree that it is your prerogative, but please don’t claim to be a Christian.

Claiming that Jesus isn’t God isn’t a little different than saying He is God; it is the opposite.  He is either God or He is not God.

Claiming that the original writings of the Bible were not inspired by God isn’t just a little different than saying they were inspired by God; it is the opposite.  The Bible is God’s Word, or it is not God’s Word.  It includes roughly 3,000 claims to speak for God, so if liberal theologians think those are all false, then why do they bother with the Book at all?  Their claim is that the authors of the Bible were blasphemous pathological liars because they falsely claimed to speak for God countless times. Here’s an example:

evans

Claiming that miracles never happen (Virgin birth, loaves & fishes, healings, the physical resurrection, etc.) isn’t just a little different than saying they did happen; it is the opposite.  The first chapter of the first book of the New Testament clearly teaches the virgin birth.  If you refuse to believe that, then put the book down and stop calling yourself a Christian.

Claiming that marriage can be for two men or two women isn’t a little different than saying it is between a man and a woman; it is the opposite.  It is claiming that marriage is not just between a man and a woman and that “marriage” is now whatever we want to define it to be.  The Bible couldn’t be more clear about God’s ideal for marriage and sexuality.

Claiming that Jesus approves of killing children up their first breath isn’t a little different than saying, “Don’t murder,” it is the opposite.

The “Christian” Left claims the opposite of what historic, orthodox, biblical Christianity does regarding the essentials of the faith.   They are entitled to their opinions, of course, but it is disingenuous and misleading for them to call themselves Christians while espousing those beliefs.

They have invented their own religion, which is their right. It would just be less confusing if they gave it a new name. It would also be more intellectually honest to stop taking money from people who believe in the essentials that those denominations were founded upon.

They appear to worship a fictional Gandhi-Christ.  The most accurate description would be that of a Hindu sect (nothing personal, Hindus!).

Run, don’t walk, from the wolves of the “Christian” Left.  They are the opposite of Christianity.

Matthew 7:15 Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves.

Bible, False teachers

Black Letters Matter!

1 Comment

The “red letter” Christians are nearly always false teachers who pretend that the only words of the Bible that really matter are direct quotes of Jesus (i.e., the words that are printed in red in some Bibles).  Their logic fails on many levels, and they can’t even get their own pet verses right.

If they were the least bit consistent they’d agree with Jesus’ “red letters” that say you should live on all the letters.   Matthew 4:4 But he answered, “It is written, “ ‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.’ ”

So, the second set of red letters teaches us to live on all the letters.  Why don’t they obey that simple teaching?

Also, note that “red-letter Christians” tip their hands at their foundational error. Jesus is God and agrees with all of scripture. He quoted the Old Testament extensively and referred to its most controversial elements without apology: Sodom and Gomorrah, Adam and Eve, Noah, Jonah, etc.

Jesus didn’t hand-write the Gospels. Like the epistles, the authors had some eyewitness accounts and some reliable second-hand accounts, and all were inspired by God.

Finally, they never seem to quote the red letters from Revelation, especially Jesus’ messages to the seven churches.   The “Christian” Left / Progressive “Christians” are the ones pushing sexual immorality and the “deep things of Satan,” as bolded below.

“ ‘I know your works, your love and faith and service and patient endurance, and that your latter works exceed the first. But I have this against you, that you tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess and is teaching and seducing my servants to practice sexual immorality and to eat food sacrificed to idols. I gave her time to repent, but she refuses to repent of her sexual immorality. Behold, I will throw her onto a sickbed, and those who commit adultery with her I will throw into great tribulation, unless they repent of her works, and I will strike her children dead. And all the churches will know that I am he who searches mind and heart, and I will give to each of you according to your works. But to the rest of you in Thyatira, who do not hold this teaching, who have not learned what some call the deep things of Satan, to you I say, I do not lay on you any other burden. Only hold fast what you have until I come.(Revelation 2:19–25, ESV)

The “red letters” crowd is full of nonsensical hypocrites.  They should be dismissed as wolves.

Black Letters Matter!

False teachers, Politics, Sexuality

Simple responses to Romans 1 pro-gay theology errors

3 Comments

The entire Bible is very clear that any sex outside of a one-man, one-woman marriage is a sin*, yet “Christian” Leftists and atheists use all sorts of fallacious sound bites to deceive and distract people.  One of the passages they work the hardest to dismiss is Romans 1:26-27.

First, read or even memorize this passage.  Also, review the entire chapter to note the context: Paul explains how the world is upside down in rebellion against God and that deep down, everyone knows it.  Then, he gives this “Exhibit A” as an example.

Romans 1:26–27 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.

Pretty clear, eh?  It describes the behavior of gays and lesbians and notes how it is a prime example of rebellion against the created order.  Note that if you keep reading the chapter, you’ll see that we all have rebelled in multiple ways, so don’t be smug just because homosexual behavior isn’t a temptation for you.  But the point here is that the passage does clearly state that homosexual behavior is a sin.  Yet countless wolves, such as Matthew Vines, use easily refuted sound bites to deceive people (many of whom are eager to be deceived).

Here are some of their objections to Romans 1 and some simple responses.  Note that you can give much more detailed responses, but those usually aren’t necessary.  Just these basics will show people how ill-informed they are on this topic and reveal whether they love the world or whether they love God.  For starters you can ask people when the last time was that they read Romans carefully.

“But Paul didn’t know any better about homosexuality” (and similar responses). This is a big tip-off that you are talking to a non-Christian, if the person saying it is a leader, or a layperson who is “saved and confused” at best.  Paul’s writings are just as much scripture as any of the Gospels.  Those writings are from Paul and the Holy Spirit and turned out just as God intended.  Paul does not disagree with Jesus.  And those using that argument have no proof that Paul wouldn’t have known about homosexual relationships.  In fact, he describes them precisely in the passage.  Also see this refutation of the related “Jesus never said anything about homosexuality” sound bite.

“The passage was about temple prostitutes.”  The passage doesn’t mention temple prostitutes, temples, or prostitutes.  And I have seen zero evidence, ever, that lesbian temple prostitutes have ever existed, so the description of lesbian behavior also refutes that.  You don’t need to know Greek to see that simple truth.

“The passage was about pederasty (adult/child) or coercive relationships.”  No, the passage refers to “men” and “women” every time. And note how they “gave up” relationships willingly and “were consumed with passion for one another.” There is no hint of coercion.

“The passage is about people abandoning their natural desires, so the real sin is if a gay behaves in a straight manner or vice verse.”  That is the most laughable objection, but you hear it often.  First, the Greek word is tied to natural functions, not desires. And it notes that they “gave up” natural relations.

And using their logic this key passage applies to exactly no one.  Think about it: Whatever anyone did — gay/straight/bi — they could claim was their nature, so they hadn’t sinned.  And very few people do things they don’t want to do, so everyone could cite that as proof that they are sinless on this account.

“They were born that way.”  No, they weren’t.  The causes can be complex (abuse, bad relationships, rebellion, or some combination of those), but even if they were born that way, everyone could use that excuse for the laundry list of sins at the end of the chapter.  Good luck with that on judgment day.

I hope you commit those to memory or refer back here when you encounter these objections.  They are so simple to refute and should convict those who use them of how badly they are butchering scripture.  You don’t need a degree in theology or Greek to see how clearly and quickly the pro-LGBTQX arguments fail.

If you really love your neighbors, you won’t lie and tell them that this behavior is without consequence.  The same goes for other sexual sins and other sins in general.  Don’t love the world and your popularity more than you love God.

1 Corinthians 6:9–11 Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

Homosexual behavior is rebellion against God.  Affirming anyone in that behavior or in other sins means that you have joined them in the rebellion.

Romans 1:32 Though they know God’s righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.

More stuff!

The main categories of pro-gay theology and why they are all false and un-biblical.

Responding to Pro-Gay Theology

Responding to same-sex marriage arguments

*The Bible couldn’t be more clear. Bible-believing Christians and even two out of the three types of pro-gay people** (religious or not) can see these truths:

– 100% of the verses addressing homosexual behavior describe it as sin in the clearest and strongest possible terms.
– 100% of the verses referring to God’s ideal for marriage involve one man and one woman.
– 100% of the verses referencing parenting involve moms and dads with unique roles (or at least a set of male and female parents guiding the children).
– 0% of 31,173 Bible verses refer to homosexual behavior in a positive or even benign way or even hint at the acceptability of homosexual unions of any kind. There are no exceptions for “committed” relationships.
– 0% of 31,173 Bible verses refer to LGBT couples parenting children.

Having said that, I believe that Christians should support and encourage those who are fighting same-sex attraction. And no one needs to grandstand on the issue before getting to the Good News of the cross.  Here’s an example.

** The three general types of pro-gay theology people:

1. “The Bible says homosexuality is wrong, but it isn’t the word of God.” (Obviously non-Christians)

2. “The Bible says it is wrong, but God changed his mind and is only telling the theological Left.” (Only about 10 things wrong with that.)

3. “The Bible is the word of God, but you are just misunderstanding it.” (Uh, no, not really.)

Apologetics, Bible, False teachers

Leopard Theology: Not as fun as it sounds

4 Comments
Leopard on tree stump
Image via Wikipedia

Many Christians teach Leopard Theology* because they believe that the Bible is only inspired in spots and that they are inspired to spot the spots.   They don’t call it that, but that is exactly what their theology is founded upon.  And, like the leopard, they camouflage themselves and are dangerous predators.  They take on church leadership roles even though they teach the opposite of the Bible.

Although claiming that the Bible isn’t fully inspired by God may seem like a humble premise, it actually makes several strong and unfounded claims.

It implies that God couldn’t or wouldn’t deliver His word to us in a reliable way and that despite God’s alleged failings, flawed humans can discern which parts were inspired and which parts were not.  Are we to believe that humans are to correct for God’s errors?  That the Holy Spirit got it wrong the first time, and He needs the world-loving “Christian” Left / Progressive “Christianity” to fix things for him 2,000 years later?

Why is this a serious problem?  It is hard enough to follow the teachings of the Bible without having “Christians” choose what “really” came from God.  Worse yet, they ignore some parts of scripture so they can teach that the opposite is not only acceptable but desirable.  Some may do it accidentally or out of laziness, but others are just blatant false teachers.  They have made up their own god and their own religion.

If someone claims the Bible is only partly inspired, ask a few questions:

  • How did they come to this conclusion?
  • Do they think their favorite verses are inspired?  If so,  how do they know?  How about John 3:16?  How about “love your neighbor?”  Whenever “Judge not, lest ye be judged” is quoted, I never hear the liberal theologians question whether Jesus really said that.
  • If the Bible is only partly inspired, how can they be sure that their preferred verses aren’t uninspired and that the ones they don’t like are the “real” verses?
  • Why is it that God couldn’t inspire the original writings of forty writers, but He can inspire billions of people to properly determine which parts are right and which aren’t?
  • If He couldn’t get Paul, Luke, Matthew, John, etc., to record his word accurately, how can He get you to do it?
  • Why should I trust your “inspiration” over those who penned the Bible or my “inspiration?”

Then there is Advanced Leopard Theology.  It is just like basic Leopard Theology, except God is also changing spots and adding or removing spots, and, oddly enough, He is only telling theological liberals and progressives.   They use phrases such as “God is still speaking,” but they don’t mean He still speaks through his Word (that would be a true statement).  They think He is still revealing new truths and changing biblical doctrines.  They may also say things like, “The Holy Spirit is moving in a new direction.”  Indeed.

Here’s an example: A Methodist pastor named Laurie Hays Coffman did a pro-gay theology piece arguing that she wants to “unfurl our corporate sails to catch today’s winds as the Spirit blows afresh.”  She said she was challenged by the vision God gave to Peter in Acts 10-11 where God makes it clear that the Gospel is for the Gentiles, too, and that the Israelites’ ceremonial dietary laws are no longer in force.  Her reasoning is that in the same way that God overturned those laws, He is now overturning the prohibitions against homosexual behavior.  If that looks like a non-sequitur to you, then you are correct.  The problem is her poor Biblical analysis.  There are at least nine things wrong with this view:

  1. The person who received the revelation was Peter, one of Jesus’ inner circle and a key leader in the early church. It wasn’t made for you, me, or someone like Ms. Coffman. That doesn’t mean God couldn’t reveal something important like this to us; just that it is highly unlikely.
  2. The visions were clear and emphatic.  Peter was given the vision three times and the incident is mentioned twice.
  3. Peter was inclined to reject the meaning of the vision. In contrast, these Advanced Leopard Theologians have views on human sexuality that are virtually indistinguishable from the prevailing culture, and they are glad to accept this allegedly new revelation.
  4. There was external validation for Peter from the Roman centurion, including a supernatural intervention.
  5. This lesson showed up in the Bible, not outside it.  I’m not saying miracles don’t happen outside the Bible.  It is just that things appear in the Bible for a reason.  God communicating that the ceremonial laws had been fulfilled was one of those “big deals.”
  6. This vision overturned a ceremonial law, not a moral law.  There are zero examples in the Bible of God reversing his moral laws.  In fact, the more Jesus talked, the stricter the laws seemed to get because He emphasized the spirit of the law and not just the letter (i.e., lust was akin to committing adultery, anger was akin to murder, etc.).  The dietary laws never applied to Gentiles.
  7. The “God has changed his mind view” is primarily being “revealed” to theologically liberal Christians in the U.S. — the very ones who often deny the authority of his Word to begin with!  So, we can’t trust the accurate transmission of the original writings, but we can trust their new revelations?  I’m skeptical.
  8. If God is revealing a change, why is it necessarily more liberal?  Why couldn’t God make his laws more stringent?
  9. The Bible strongly warns not to add or take away from its teachings.

But the orthodox can fall prey to this in a more subtle way by claiming full inspiration but conveniently ignoring passages we don’t like.  Consider this passage on church leadership, where some exaggerate “not given to drunkenness” to mean no alcohol whatsoever but ignore the “must manage his own family well . . .” part.

1 Timothy 3:2-4 Now the overseer must be above reproach, the husband of but one wife, temperate, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not given to drunkenness, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money. He must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him with proper respect.

Another example is correctly teaching about the sin of homosexual behavior while neglecting to give proper emphasis to Biblical admonitions against divorce, adultery, and fornication.  We need to teach all of scripture with balance.  Grandstanding on sins that aren’t temptations to us and soft-pedaling those that are not attractive or Christian things to do.

There are plenty of reasons and resources to defend the accuracy and integrity of all of the original scriptures.  We don’t need to get sloppy and just follow the parts we like.  We truly miss out when we cast doubts on every passage and question if it is really the word of God. Yes, read it in context and seek to carefully and accurately understand it, but also have the faith of a child that the one true God reliably delivered his word to us.

I’ll close with some friendly advice: Don’t mess with God’s Word.

Deuteronomy 4:2 You shall not add to the word that I command you, nor take from it, that you may keep the commandments of the Lord your God that I command you.

Proverbs 30:5–6 Every word of God proves true; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him. Do not add to his words, lest he rebuke you and you be found a liar.

Revelation 22:18–19 I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book.

*Also known as Dalmatian Theology.

Also see:

Bible, False teachers

Opposites

5 Comments

One of my irritations with the “Christian” Left and their theology is that it pretends to be slightly different from orthodox Christianity while it is usually 180 degrees off when it comes to the essentials of the faith and any current hot topics.  Please note that by “Leftist theology,” I don’t mean the theology of political liberals.  I am referring to people who call themselves Christians but deny the essentials of the historic faith (i.e., the kinds of things countless martyrs died for — Jesus’ divinity and exclusivity, the authority of scripture, etc.) and are indistinguishable from the world on sexual ethics.  If you want to debate the disputable matters, go right ahead.  I’m flexible on those.  But words mean things, and far too many people use the term Christian in error.

For example, claiming that Jesus is one of many paths to God isn’t a little different than saying He is the only way; it is the opposite.  There is either one way, or there is not one way.  The Bible has over 100 passages teaching directly or indirectly that Jesus is the only way to salvation.  If you don’t agree that it is your prerogative, but please don’t claim to be a Christian.

Claiming that Jesus isn’t God isn’t a little different than saying He is God; it is the opposite.  He is either God or He is not God.

Claiming that the original writings of the Bible were not inspired by God isn’t just a little different than saying they were inspired by God; it is the opposite.  The Bible is God’s Word, or it is not God’s Word.  It includes roughly 3,000 claims to speak for God, so if liberal theologians think those are all false, then why do they bother with the Book at all?  Their claim is that the authors of the Bible were blasphemous pathological liars because they falsely claimed to speak for God countless times. Here’s an example:

evans

Claiming that miracles never happen (Virgin birth, loaves & fishes, healings, the physical resurrection, etc.) isn’t just a little different than saying they did happen; it is the opposite.  The first chapter of the first book of the New Testament clearly teaches the virgin birth.  If you refuse to believe that, then put the book down and stop calling yourself a Christian.

Claiming that marriage can be for two men or two women isn’t a little different than saying it is between a man and a woman; it is the opposite.  It is claiming that marriage is not just between a man and a woman and that “marriage” is now whatever we want to define it to be.  The Bible couldn’t be more clear about God’s ideal for marriage and sexuality.

Claiming that Jesus approves of killing children up their first breath isn’t a little different than saying, “Don’t murder,” it is the opposite.

The “Christian” Left claims the opposite of what historic, orthodox, biblical Christianity does regarding the essentials of the faith.   They are entitled to their opinions, of course, but it is disingenuous and misleading for them to call themselves Christians while espousing those beliefs.

They have invented their own religion, which is their right. It would just be less confusing if they gave it a new name. It would also be more intellectually honest to stop taking money from people who believe in the essentials that those denominations were founded upon.

They appear to worship a fictional Gandhi-Christ.  The most accurate description would be that of a Hindu sect (nothing personal, Hindus!).

Run, don’t walk, from the wolves of the “Christian” Left.  They are the opposite of Christianity.

Matthew 7:15 Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves.

Roundup

Roundup

2 Comments

Galatians 6:9–10 And let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up. So then, as we have opportunity, let us do good to everyone, and especially to those who are of the household of faith.

We can grow weary at times, but we should always seek to do good.  Do note that we should have a special focus on helping other believers.  This makes a great witness to the world.

__________

Strawman argument 101: Is it any surprise that the pervert rainbow crowd continues to pretend that the Florida bill prohibited saying the word “gay?” To repeat that lie is ignorance at best and malice at worst. If you hear people call it that, just remind them that a more apt nickname would be the “anti-grooming” bill.

__________

https://twitter.com/i/status/1508862597692592141

__________

Videos: Suddenly The Media DESPERATELY Wants You To Know The Hunter Biden Laptop Story Is Real — What choreography! Of course we know that the media didn’t collectively generate a conscience. Someone has decided that Joe must go. Too bad that before the election all those “experts” didn’t immediately decide that the laptop was definitely fake and definitely Russian disinformation and that we must be forbidden from even talking about it.

__________

Yeah, definitely not a function of perverse education and media systems . . .

__________

How CDC Colluded With Teachers’ Unions to Devastate America’s Children — As if you needed another reason to know how despicable and counterproductive teachers’ unions are. Public sector unions should be illegal.

__________

__________

They should all be held accountable for their lies and the incalculable damage they did to millions of people, especially children.

__________

She was foolish to use drugs anywhere, but especially in a foreign country. Aside from her America-bashing, it is ludicrous how her supporters want to blame her incarceration on her being paid less than NBA players. She is welcome to their pay as soon as she’s good enough to make one of their teams.

__________

Roundup

Roundup

3 Comments

I love when Paul says, “Do not be deceived.”   You can be sure that some deep truth is about to be laid down.  In this case, it is the famous “reap what you sow” saying.  Sin has consequences.  We shouldn’t confuse God’s patience with his approval or indifference.

Galatians 6:7–8 Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap. For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption, but the one who sows to the Spirit will from the Spirit reap eternal life.

__________

‘Gender Justice’: Elizabeth Warren Makes Worst Student Debt Argument Yet — That’s stupid, even for her. So women are strong, smart, and independent, but also more likely to assume debts that they can’t repay. Sounds like Warren is saying that women need more patriarchy, stat! If the RNC was smart (it isn’t), it would run lots of ads on this to target men and those who didn’t go to college or who never took loans or already paid them off. Why should they have to fund the women who got Lesbian Astrology degrees just so the Dems can buy votes for only $50,000 apiece? CORRECTION: Those people will almost certainly still vote for Democrats.

__________

Disney’s Support for Child Grooming Is a Game Changer — creepy, yet predictable. The Disney degenerates are going warp-speed with their perversions and grooming.

__________

__________

Complete clown show for Biden, his handlers, the Democrats, and the media. Biden has dementia, to be sure, but he is still gaslighting here, as are the rest if they expect you to believe what he says. Oh, and the cue cards . . .

__________

Pipe Down, Ladies, and Know Your Place: Female Cyclists Warned Not to Complain About Men Competing in Their Sport — Women fight the “patriarchy,” which was the best thing that ever happened to them, but they put up with this “trans” nonsense. It is pathetic. They should mock and fire anyone putting forth rules that say you have to live in denial of reality so as not to upset those who live to shake their puny fists at God.

__________

Not recent, but good to see. That lady is so deluded that she’d probably pass a polygraph saying how “nice” she is.

__________

Top DEI staff at public universities pocket massive salaries as experts question motives of initiatives — Yikes! Lots of these worthless jobs pay $400k per year. Too bad AOC, Warren, and the like don’t focus on the inflated costs of college rather than on forcing truck drivers to fund their useless Masters degrees. The Diversity, Inclusion and Equity grift is all about uniformity and exclusion, as well as making you pay for their racism and perversions.

__________

‘OK, Groomer’: Democrats Go All-In on Promoting LGBTQ to Young Children — As despicable as their behavior is, I’m glad the “Don’t groom little kids” bill brought their evils more into the light.

Get your kids out of government schools. The newer teachers have been saturated in these perversions for most of their lives and think they are doing a moral good to groom your kids. The laws won’t stop them. They’ll work overtime finding ways around them.

We’re going to need a lot of millstones to clean this place up.

Roundup

Roundup

4 Comments

I think of this often when people don’t like hearing the truth, no matter how carefully and graciously it is shared.

Galatians 4:16 Have I then become your enemy by telling you the truth?

__________

Covid: CDC study finds about 78% of people hospitalized were overweight or obese — They had that information in the first few months of Covid. Why wasn’t more attention given to it then? That’s rhetorical, of course.

__________

Roundup

Roundup

Sadly and predictably, “Christian” Leftists often pervert this verse by pretending that men and women aren’t different at all and don’t have different roles in the kingdom, or that it is OK for men to have sex with men, or that you can change your gender, etc.  That’s absurdly out of context.  It is a great verse noting the value of each person and how level things are at the foot of the cross.

Galatians 3:28 There is no Jew or Greek, slave or free, male and female; since you are all one in Christ Jesus.

__________

Hunter Biden’s Laptop And The 2020 Election Conspiracy — Yeah, it wasn’t suspicious at all that within 5 minutes they had so many journalists and security experts insisting that they “knew” it was not just disinformation but Russian disinformation. The media is only acknowledging the laptop now because they are turning on Biden. Yes, I took it at face value once I read the details. So did the MSM and Big Tech, which is why they instantly blocked any communication of the story.

__________

Feminists protesting Lia Thomas say they are politically homeless: ‘Democrats don’t care about women’ — Shhhhh . . . don’t tell the Dems that their extremist climate/tranny/coveting agenda is costing them votes with blacks, Hispanics, and now females of all colors. But most feminists are staying silent: Women’s advocacy groups silent on transgender swimmer Lia Thomas’ domination at NCAA championships. They will get what they deserve, a seat on the back of the bus behind men pretending to be women. Cowards always fail.

__________

__________

Christian Band ‘Rend Collective’ Says NOT using Trans Pronouns is Hate Speech — No, what is hateful is forcing other people to affirm your delusions while you won’t let them hold their beliefs. Just another “Christian” rock band.

__________

__________

If you hear someone refer to toxic masculinity, be sure to point out that toxic femininity crushes and dismembers ~3,000 children per day in the U.S. Yes, some men do toxic things, but the Left is trying to say that all masculinity is toxic.

__________

Your trustworthy media working hard to airbrush a guy into a girl. And still failing.

__________

Yeah, it has nothing to do with the guy having a penis out in a female locker room. Note how this horrific woman (?!) thinks the female swimmers should be kicked off the UPenn team if they don’t want to be naked with him in a locker room. Why are these cowards putting up with this nonsense? The Pervert Lobby should be shouted down and mocked into irrelevance, and they would be if only normal people would grow a pair.

But if you say he shouldn’t compete with women but still call him a her, then you are part of the problem and missing the bigger picture.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1505654911916122122

__________

https://twitter.com/i/status/1505960101856874496

__________

Homeschooling family from Alabama raises 10 kids who all started college before age 13 — nice!

__________

Clay Travis: Deshaun Watson Situation Proves It’s All About Winning In NFL — The NFL is racist against black quarterbacks! Also, the NFL approved the largest contract in history – and fully guaranteed! — to a black quarterback with 22 sexual lawsuits against him. And yes, if Colin K. had Watson’s talent he’d be playing in the league. But he doesn’t, so he’s not. He just pops his head up every now and then to stay in the spotlight.

__________

Roundup

Roundup

3 Comments

What a beautiful verse!  You could meditate on it daily.  If you repented and trusted in the real Jesus, He lives in you because He loves you and gave himself for you.  The creator of the universe, God in flesh, did that.

Galatians 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.

__________

2022 Midterms: 20-1, North Carolina university employees are donating to Democrats over Republicans — Because diversity. I can’t imagine why any conservative would ever donate to their alma mater, even if they name a sportsball venue after you.

__________

__________

I was glad to see at least a minor amount of justice for Jussie Smollett and that the judge whaled on him. But the prosecutors and judge still missed a key point: Smollett committed a hate crime against heterosexuals and whites by pretending that he was accosted by them. He knew that was a lie. He did it to increase racial and pervert lobby tensions. I wish he would have received even more jail time.

__________

The Immortal Sowell — Yep. Sowell is amazing. I came across him in the late 80s/early 90s when he wrote for Forbes. Truly an intellectual giant.

In a reasonable world, Thomas Sowell’s life would be celebrated in the same way we honor Frederick Douglass, George Washington Carver, and Marian Anderson—as a black hero, born into a genuinely systemically racist America, who not only endured but prevailed.

__________

‘Christianity Today’ Rocked By Scandal, Say ‘Sexual Harassment Went Unchecked’ at Company For Decade — Gee, but their theology is so solid. /sarcasm Sadly, the world will blame Christianity but not the “Christian” Left religion behind this.

__________

Affordable Housing Activists Demand Homebuilders Build Fewer Houses — They do it via rent controls, which inevitably lead to fewer available homes. Also, letting millions of illegal immigrants pour over our borders increases the demand for housing, especially in big cities. Once again, Leftists create a major problem then make it worse with their counterproductive “solutions.”

__________

__________

President Woodrow Wilson: A Hater’s Guide — Yikes, he was far worse than I thought! And I thought he was pretty bad.

__________

I came across this Meryl Streep quote. She’s pro-abortion, of course. Just another completely tone-deaf, hypocritical, God-mocking, Molech-worshiping ghoul. Feminism is poison. We need more patriarchy.

“I do honestly think that if women were running the world there would be more investment in peace, because basically as women we do not want to see our children killed. Maybe I am completely idealistic, but until we see women in equal positions of power in the world, I just think that we are doomed. – Meryl Streep

__________

The Times finally admits Hunter Biden’s laptop is real — As if you needed more evidence that the “paper of record” is an arm of the DNC. Congrats to all of you who knew from the beginning that the Russia thing was a hoax, that Hunter’s laptop was real, that the Jan. 6 thing was wildly overblown, that the government wildly abused the Covid situation and more. Give it time and the MSM will quietly admit that the 2020 election was stolen.

__________

This tracks with what I’ve seen with blogging over the last 15 years.

__________

We’re going to need a lot of millstones to clean this place up. Every adult associated with that should be in jail.

__________

Top ‘Fact Checker’ Labeled Hunter Biden Laptop Story a “Hoax” — As if you needed another reason to mock and ignore the Leftist “fact checkers.”

__________

Tiny Tim Keller Tip Toes Through The Leftist Twitter Tulips — He is so disappointing. I’m surprised at some of those who associate with him.

__________

BLM Activist and Hubby Face Federal Fraud Charges After Using Nonprofit Donations on Lavish Lifestyle — I’m not surprised at the fraud (grifters gonna grift), but I’m pleasantly surprised that the government investigated them and filed charges.

__________

She can thank the Pervert Lobby for this.

__________

__________

Lia Thomas is a male. Anyone referring to him as “her” should be ashamed. Then again, feminists brought this on themselves by being full-blown Leftists.

__________

Government schools.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1493713299308830720

__________

Brought to you by the Left — including the “Christian” Left.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1494032783437484034

__________

ESPN’s Takes Moment of Silence in Protest of ‘Don’t Say Gay’ — OK, groomer. ESPN and Disney are so perverted that not being able to sexualize young kids is akin to someone dying. It causes them that much grief.

__________

__________

__________

Apparently, there are no economists at The Economist.