This book is a great take-down of common “Christian” Left half-truths and outright lies. It is a shorter and easier read than J. Gresham Machen’s classic 1923 book, Christianity and Liberalism, which I’ve also been reading (hard to believe it is almost 100 years old, as it still perfectly describes “Christian” Left wolves and their theology).
I loved this endorsement, especially the part I put in bold:
Don’t let the brevity of this book fool you . Mike Kruger has written a trenchant critique of the intellectual bankruptcy and theological deviancy of progressive Christianity. Churches , pastors , students , youth groups , Christian schools , and Christian colleges would do well to appropriate the wisdom in this short but devastating little book . Kevin DeYoung , Senior Pastor , Christ Covenant
A couple excerpts from the book:
In 1923 , J . Gresham Machen , then a professor at Princeton Seminary , wrote his classic text , Christianity and Liberalism . 1 The book was a response to the rise of liberalism in the mainline denominations of his own day. Machen argued that the liberal understanding of Christianity was , in fact , not just a variant version of the faith , nor did it represent simply a different denominational perspective , but was an entirely different religion . Put simply , liberal Christianity is not Christianity.
. . .
On top of all of this , one might understandably be confused by the progressive appeal to Jesus as a guide for morality when many progressives won’t, in fact , follow Jesus ’ moral teaching! For example , are progressives willing to stand by Jesus ’ plain teaching that marriage is between a man and a woman ( e.g . , Matthew 19 : 5 – 6 ) ? Or that he is the only way of salvation ( John 14 : 6 ) ? If not, then why the eagerness to appeal to him as a moral teacher?
. . .
Jesus never said the problem with the Pharisees is that they are too concerned with orthodoxy . The problem with the Pharisees was legalism (putting man – made laws ahead of God’s) and hypocrisy (saying one thing and doing another). And the two often went together . It wasn’t that they cared too much about good theology , but that they cared too little! Their theology was a mess. It glorified man , twisted God’s own priorities, and selectively followed God’s law. This raises an important point. Teaching people good theology is not the problem, but the solution. Teaching people good theology is a vital , essential way of caring for them. Rather than viewing theology as something that harms and oppresses people, we should be reminded that good theology actually comforts and liberates people. The Pharisees harmed people precisely by teaching them (and modeling for them ) bad theology.
Pontius Pilate was another terrific piece of historical fiction by Paul L. Maier. As noted in my comments on another one of his books, The Flames of Rome, Maier is very disciplined with his rules for historical fiction: No proper names are invented, nothing knowingly contradicts historical facts and great care is exercised to fill in gaps. Any created or assumed portions are documented in the end notes.
It was fascinating to get the Roman perspective on the life of Jesus and to think more about Pilate’s background. Also, for once, I finally have all the Herod’s straight in my mind, along with the relationship of Herodias (who encouraged her daughter Salome to ask for the head of John the Baptist) to the Herods. We’ll see how long that lasts.
Not that I am pro-Roman now, but this helped me to see how the Jews would not have been the easiest group of people to govern. The book did help me gain an appreciation for what Rome did well and where it did some bizarre things.
The author has Pilate interacting with Cornelius, the Roman Centurion from Acts 10 as well as Paul. While the accounts are fictionalized, it is quite likely that Cornelius and Pilate would have met on occassion (they both lived in Caeserea).
Here’s an interesting factoid from the footnotes regarding the darkness at the crucifixion.
This phenomenon, evidently, was visible in Rome, Athens, and other Mediterranean cities. According to Tertullian, Apologeticus, xxi, 20, it was a “cosmic” or “world event.” Phlegon, a Greek author from Caria writing a chronology soon after 137 A.D., reported that in the fourth year of the 202nd Olmpiad (i.e., 33 A.D.) there was “the greatest eclipse of the sun,” and that “it became night in the sixth hour of the day [i.e., noon] so that stars even appeared in the heavens. There was a great earthquake in Bithynia, and many things were overturned in Nicaea.”
Hmmm . . . sounds a little like Matthew 27:45 – “From the sixth hour until the ninth hour darkness came over all the land.” I love reading about historical and archeological accounts that confirm Biblical truths.
When the girls were young we enjoyed reading a book titled Hey! That’s not what the Bible says! by Bill Ross. From Amazon:
. . . unique and very creative look into some of the Bible’s most popular stories including the Garden of Eden, Moses and the burning bush, and Jesus’ birth. 10 stories in all are told in cartoonish fashion with a familiar group of kids always popping up to remind us…That’s Not What the Bible Says! The complete stories from the Bible are included along with each story as references for families to spend family time reading together.
It was a clever way to point out the central message of the stories: Tell them the wrong way, after which the kids would yell, “Hey! That’s not what the Bible says,” then tell them the right way and the kids would say, “Now that’s what the Bible says!”
For example, the first story has God telling Adam and Eve the rule about the tree, and they obey and everyone lives happily ever after. Then the story is told the right way.
I adapted a couple stories and made up a couple of my own when leading some family devotionals on a Sunday School class trip and for an Indian Princess campout (a YMCA program where dads and daughters (K – 3rd grade) would camp together. The name wasn’t politically correct enough so it is now called Adventure Guides).
A couple hundred dads and daughters would come to the very brief Sunday morning “service.” We had the opportunity to lead the service several times, so I always worked hard to find something Biblical to reach the kids and their dads (many of the attendees did not attend regular church services).
The “Hey! That’s not what the Bible says” theme was perfect. I could quickly lay out the whole Gospel using five short stories. The kids in our “tribe” would hold up signs to cue all the dads and girls to yell out. I was able to address original sin, redemption & forgiveness, the divinity of Jesus and how we get into Heaven – all without talking over their heads.
If you like historical fiction, check out The Flames of Rome by Paul L. Maier. He is a professor of Ancient History at Western Michigan University. I have heard him on various radio shows and read a few of his books and have always been impressed with his passion and accuracy.
The story of Emperors Claudius and Nero and some of the early Christians was fascinating by itself, and the exhaustively researched and documented facts provide a simultaneous history lesson. I had heard bits about this period of history but nothing this comprehensive. It doesn’t hold back on the excesses of Nero and others.
The author is very disciplined with his rules for historical fiction: No proper names are invented, nothing knowingly contradicts historical facts and great care is exercised to fill in gaps. Any created or assumed portions are documented in the end notes.
Where multiple theories exist, such as the source of the great fires of Rome, the most likely scenario is used in the narrative while others are analyzed in the end notes.
This gives you a glimpse of how the early church started and the challenges they faced.
The Question of God: C.S. Lewis and Sigmund Freud Debate God, Love, Sex, and the Meaning of Life by Armand M. Nicholi Jr. was a terrific book about two men with some ironic similarities in their upbringing but who arrived at radically different worldviews. Based on what I have read elsewhere about both men, I thought Nicholi did a balanced and fair job in presenting their lives and views. PBS did a decent special about the book, except for the people they brought in to comment on it.
For the past 25 years, Armand M. Nicholi has taught a similar course at Harvard, where he compares Freud’s atheist-based reasoning against the atheist-turned-believer C.S. Lewis. Both men were considered brilliant, highly educated thinkers who profoundly influenced 20th-century thought. And both men presented compelling arguments for and against the existence of God.
Hold onto your hats, people. Tammy Bruce is an openly gay, pro-choice, non-Christian, but I’m a fan of hers. Seriously. Of course, I disagree with her on those topics, but I appreciate her style and we have a lot of common ground elsewhere. And she is willing to draw some lines where others will not.
I read “The Death of Right and Wrong” and highly recommend it. She is truly a breath of fresh air. She is candid, honest, brave, funny and hard to label.
For example, though she is gay she described some of the horrific things some pro-gay groups have done in schools and said: “It’s time we demand that radical gays leave children alone, no matter how politically incorrect the argument becomes” (and this was written in 2003 . . . things have gotten worse).
No liberal groups are spared, including Planned Parenthood, Jesse Jackson & Co., NOW, academia, the media and the justice system.
She read C.S. Lewis’ classic Mere Christianity and took it very seriously, seeing the wisdom in his moral reasoning.
She doesn’t demonize or hate Christians (I pray that she becomes a Christian one day). In fact, she developed a lot of respect for them when they donated to her NOW organization during the OJ trial. They disagreed on her group’s pro-choice views but they cared about the battered women Tammy was trying to help. Tammy took the unpopular position of being against OJ because of that pesky matter of abusing and murdering his ex-wife, while most NOW leaders took OJ’s side as if the issue at hand were race.
She has a new book out that I’ll be reading soon – The New American Revolution.
When the girls we young we read them countless books. We really enjoyed the “Carl” series, including Good Dog, Carl.
Carl is a rottweiler who is left in charge of the baby in different places. Everything in the book is normal except for the part where the mom says, “Look after the baby, Carl. I’ll be back shortly,” and then Carl and the baby have wild adventures that end with Carl cleaning up and sort-of putting things back to normal.
Two thumbs up!