When Liberals refer to me as “anti-choice” I realize it is a predictable personal attack to make it sound like I’m anti-freedom. As usual, they aren’t finishing their sentences (anti-choice to do what?) and they are ignoring that another human being gets killed when one of the alternatives is chosen.
My first reaction is that I am not ashamed to be anti-choice, provided that they mean “anti-choice to crush and dismember innocent human beings (regular abortions) or anti-choice to stick a sharp instrument in a baby’s head and suck out her brains (partial-birth abortions, aka infanticide) or anti-choice to let born-alive abortion surviving babies die in closets (the method of infanticide protected by Barack Obama).”
The ironic thing is that other than the legalized destruction of innocent human beings these folks are really the ones who are anti-choice:
Anti-school choice (whether it is the choice of which public school to attend or the option of home schooling)
Anti-choice of parents to know if their children are receiving birth control at school
Anti-choice of parents to know if their children are having an abortion, which involves great physical and mental risks to their daughters in addition to destroying their grandchildren
Anti-choice for medical professionals not to perform abortions or dispense abortion pills
Anti-choice to own guns
Anti-choice of the unborn to determine if they can live
Anti-choice for secret union ballots
Anti-choice to access conservative radio shows
Anti-choice to teach the flaws of Darwinian evolutionary theory
Anti-choice of people to choose how they want health care insured or provided
Anti-choice on the voters of America to decide social issues democratically
Let’s just say that consistency on the “choice” topic isn’t their strong suit.
What others am I missing?