Stephen Meyer’s Signature in the Cell is only $2.99?! You can’t afford not to buy it!
Get your teenage girls to read it by telling them it is a new book by Stephen(ie) Meyer, author of the Twilight series. They’ll thank you later.
—
The Amnesty bill is a farce and one of the single most destructive pieces of legislation ever, even though — or because — Leftists are drooling over it. Just the rumors of it have greatly increased the number of illegal immigrants pouring into the U.S. It is the same old vested interests: Republican businessmen who can’t see 15 minutes into the future and think the low wage employees will help them, coupled with Democratic politicians who see decades of committed Democrat voters. You get more of what you reward. In this case, we are rewarding those who broke the law and punishing those who followed it.
If we just enforced the current laws requiring employers to validate citizenship/immigration status then we would solve much of the problem.
Jesus wants you to help others with your money, not the money of others. Lavishing benefits on illegal immigrants (which goes far beyond what Matthew 25 referred to) and ONLY on those who break the law to get into the country is taking money from other people (via taxes or lost jobs) and giving it to others — all the while telling yourself how nice you are!
We don’t have enough jobs for the people who are here, thanks to Obama’s successful execution of the Cloward-Piven strategy. How will we have jobs for these new people and the money to pay for their schools, welfare, medical care, etc. Has anyone noticed our $16T+ national debt and tens of trillions of unfunded liabilities? How will borrowing more money from China help anyone in the long-term?
—
A good post-Memorial Day reminder about a way to truly honor those who died for our freedoms: Fight to keep those freedoms alive.
I don’t know if that scene actually happened or if it was the creation of some Hollywood screenwriter, but I think there is some wisdom in Captain Miller’s message. “Earn this!” His statement to Private Ryan was simple – don’t let my sacrifice, my death on this bridge, my dying at the hands of the German army we’re fighting – don’t let that be in vain. He was telling the private to lead a worthwhile life after the war, one which would be worthy of the sacrifice of brave men who fought and died. At least that’s what *I* got out of that scene.
What does that mean to us today – not letting the sacrifice of fallen warriors be in vain? I think it means not only to exercise the freedoms they bought and secured for us, but also to be vigilant against anyone who’d try to take them. “Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel,” warned Patrick Henry. Yeah, the “give me liberty or give me death” guy.
—
Don’t miss this piece on The Politics of Thought Control. It analyzes the mindset behind this true story:
Two girls grew up together and were the best of friends. Each married fine young men. One moved far away to another state. Now women, they began to drift apart in other ways, including the way they viewed the world. One became quite liberal; the other quite conservative.
On a visit home, the conservative asked the liberal about her husband’s contracting business. The liberal was comfortable admitting her husband wasn’t paying his taxes. The conservative expressed her shock. The liberal responded, “oh, don’t worry, we’re going to make a contribution to the Democratic Party.”
And it has a great summary of how, by any measure, conservatives are far more generous than Liberals. And it isn’t just in giving to their churches, as the Liberal defenders like to claim.
• Liberals make more money than conservatives.
• Despite this income gap, conservatives give 30 percent more to charity than liberals.
• Religious conservatives give an average of $2367 per year to charity compared to $1347 for the rest of the country.
• Religious conservatives give more to secular charities than everyone else.
• Conservatives donate more blood, sweat, and tears than everyone else as measured by blood given to blood banks and personal time devoted to directly helping others.
• Brooks looked at attitudes of folks concerning distribution of income and religion. Folks who do not believe in income redistribution schemes and attend church services give away a hundred times more than folks who do believe in income redistribution schemes and don’t attend religious services.
• Secular liberals are the “whitest” and richest of the four groups Mr. Brooks identified. Nonetheless, they give 19% less to charity than religious conservatives.
—
Additions to the blogroll: Blog Mommas and Stretching My Faith.
—
Fourteen Ways Your Life Improves When You Get Your Personal Finances Under Control — some good encouragement if you aren’t there yet!
—
If the LGBTQX lobby really cares about equality, then why not equality for lesbians guilty of statutory rape? Instead, they reflexively line up to support anyone who holds to their perverted sexual views.
—
The endless shamelessness of the baby-killers/statutory rape-hiders at Planned Parenthood. Uh, your baby will thank you for what — having her crushed and dismembered because you didn’t want her?! It is right up there with the deadly cynicism of their “Care. No Matter what.” slogan. Gee, that sounds like a bit more like a pro-life slogan, not a pro-abortion slogan. I mean, if you really cared, wouldn’t you have the baby instead of killing her?
—
Have you heard about this? Stretched by riots, Swedish police call reinforcements. The article is part of the problem: These are Muslims who came to their country and are soaking up all sorts of welfare benefits and demanding to be appeased at every turn. It is rampant in Europe and creeping in the U.S. But the article just describes them as “youths.” Not one mention of their origin or religion. Unlike leaders in the West, the Muslims actually think into the future and they are executing a brilliant but evil plan. Will we wake up in the U.S., or continue to follow the useful idiots who feed others to the crocodile hoping it will eat them last? — The need for executive leadership in the White House — Obama didn’t have it, and it shows. He is obviously behind the scandals we know about (and have you wondered about all the things we don’t know about?) — AP, Benghazi, IRS, Fox News, etc. If he wasn’t then he’d be firing people in all these cases for their lawlessness and for not informing him. But he obviously did know about and approve the illegal actions, and he knows that if he fired them that they might not be silent about his roles. Having said that, the problem still isn’t just Obama. It is government that is too big. We need to make the issues about simplifying tax laws, reducing the power of the IRS, etc.
—
Yep.
—
The NY Times has come a long way — the wrong way.
—
Sorry, couldn’t resist. That movie deserves to be made fun of.