Tag Archives: NBC News

The tactics of the race baiters

Race baiters are hypocritical and destructive.  They pretend to care for minorities but really just want to foster division and perpetuate racism.  It is a profit center for them.  See The New N-Word: ‘Food Stamps’ : The Other McCain.

Their new angle is claiming that mentions of the massive increase in food stamps under the administration of a half-black President is clear evidence of racism:

According to David Gregory of NBC News, it is “coded racially-tinged language” to mention the increased use of food stamps under President Obama’s economic agenda.

I am not a fan of Newt Gingrich, but he makes a valid point here:

You want to be a country that creates food stamps, in which case frankly Obama’s is an enormous success. The most successful food stamp president in American history. Or do you want to be a country that creates paychecks?

Here are some unpleasant facts for Liberals (my only quibble with the graph is that I prefer the Y-axis to start at zero):

As you would expect, false teachers like race-baiter Chuck “Jesus is not the only way” Currie jumped on the “food stamps = N-word” bandwagon.  See Newt Gingrich’s Racially Charged Campaign For President.  To make matters worse, check out Chuck’s bonus hypocrisy:

Gingrich might find some success among GOP primary voters and Tea Party activists by employing racist rethoric but I believe our country is a different place than it was a generation ago.

Right after claiming to be all about unity, he calls all Republicans racist.  Can’t you just feel the love from this serial, unrepentant liar?

Also remember that Chuck and the rest of these liberals are wildly pro-legalized abortion, which kills blacks at a rate 3x that of whites.  But that apparently isn’t high enough for them.  They want taxpayer-funded abortions, which they know will take that rate even higher.  So are the real racists?  Ask your self which is more racist:

A. Mentioning the indisputable fact that food stamps have increased dramatically under this administration.

B. Supporting and advancing policies that kill blacks at a rate 3x that of whites and will take that number even higher.  

Finally, isn’t it racist of the Liberals to assume that everyone on food stamps is black?


Fire the media — Seriously.  Great analysis of how we got where we are from the American Spectator.

Scientific dogma — Dogma isn’t just for non-Liberals.  Read this excellent analysis of how dogma is driving the climate change debate and costing us billions of dollars.

And further down in her post she gives some examples of what we should expect if climate science were not plagued by the sort of dogmatic beliefs that are elsewhere decried (and rightly so) as being anti-scientific.

“Well, lets try this. In 2010, lets assume that there are very very few climate scientists left that regard the IPCC as dogma. What might this look like?

  • no petitions signed by members of the IPCC or national academy members
  • Nature and Science not writing op-eds that decry “deniers”
  • no climate scientists writing op-eds that decry the “deniers”
  • no climate scientists talking about “consensus” as an argument against disagreement (argumentum ad populam, h/t Nullius in Verba)
  • IPCC scientists debating skeptics about the science
  • climate scientists stop talking about cap and trade and UNFCCC policies because the science demands that we do this
  • no more professional society statements supporting the IPCC”

Also see This must be the best laugh of the week for climate skeptics

The results of a survey carried out among readers of the frantically Warmist “Scientific American” are now available.

It must have nearly choked them to publish the results. It’s a wonder they didn’t “fudge” the results, in fact. Fudging results is standard operating procedure for Warmists. See HERE or HERE for instance

Go Here to see all.

Talk about a propaganda fail! And this was among a readership that would have been highly literate scientifically.

Top Ten Countdown: Reasons Why People Vote Democrat — I would have left off #1, but the rest are accurate.

Superior overview of the Bible and homosexuality by John MacArthur.  Save the link. (Hat tip: Mark)

QUESTION: Has HillBuzz.org changed your opinions on the gay community? – interesting thread with lots of interesting comments.  They don’t read the Lefty script like most gays do, so they have done a lot to tick off the establishment.  Good for them.

Great send up of a popular bumper sticker (hat tip: Glenn)

Why yes, Mr. President, if unemployment was 5% then we would have had more confidence in your policies choices.  But it isn’t 5%, because they didn’t work, so we don’t have confidence in them!

This is important.

Funny Pictures - Cat Diary