While it is a scientific fact that the unborn are unique, living human beings from conception, many pro-legalized abortion advocates try to deny that fact and pretend that it is a religious question. Mississippi has a “personhood” initiative on the Nov. 8 ballot that even many Democrats in the state are supporting. This has the pro-abort crowd very, very nervous. It has the chances of challenging Roe v Wade.
Fake Christians who support the the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice are parroting the Planned Parenthood agenda:
People throughout the country are taking action to defeat Mississippi Initiative 26, the “personhood” initiative. If passed November 8, it will have far-reaching consequences not only for women and men in Mississippi but for individuals throughout the country. It could be the start of a larger “personhood” agenda. We already know that Nevada, Tennessee, and Florida will have a similar measure on their ballots in 2012.
By legally defining a human being from the moment of fertilization, MS 26 criminalizes abortion without exempting cases of rape, incest, or life of the pregnant woman.
But it is a scientific fact that a unique human being is created at the moment of conception. And the scare tactics aren’t working. People know that women will get treated for ectopic pregnancies. The former doctor for our Care Net Pregnancy Center even performed those, and he was more than just a little pro-life. Abortions to save the life of the mother are consistent with the pro-life ethic.
RCRC is working with the coalition of physicians, infertility advocates and reproductive health organizations that has mobilized to challenge the measure and to spread the word about unforeseen consequences of the anti-choice movement’s overreach. Mississippians for Healthy Families, the political committee formed in response to MS 26, says that the amendment “puts politics above the health and safety of women.”
That’s just a series of lies. Even the name of the RCRC is a lie: Abortion isn’t about “reproductive choice” because a new human being has already been reproduced. And it ignores the lives of the unborn. What about their health and safety?
The “personhood” initiative raises troubling moral issues, regardless of a person’s view of abortion. Whil religions across the spectrum respect and value life and many have an official pro-choice position, RCRC has identified these issues as of deep concern:
The initiative is one-sided and narrow – it concentrates solely on the fetus and ignores the woman’s life entirely.
It concentrates on the human being who would otherwise be crushed and dismembered because she is unwanted.
Endowing a fetus with legal rights independent of the pregnant woman could set up a conflict that could place the health and dignity of the woman on a lower level.
That’s just gibberish.
People of faith are also concerned that this initiative would enact into law specific religious views about “personhood” and in doing so, violate the foundational principle of religious freedom.
That’s simply false. All they need to do is point to scientific facts. Ironically, they are taking what should be a non-religious argument, turning it into a religious argument, and then trying to force their religious views on the rest of us.
They also trot out the rape and incest arguments, but they are wildly inconsistent on those. They approve of death for the innocent daughter or son of the rapist, but typically oppose capital punishment for the rapist himself. And abortions for incest typically hide the crime and kill the innocent in the process.
As always, if it isn’t a human being, then she’s not pregnant. Don’t be fooled by the arguments of phony “religious” people.