Tag Archives: homophobia

If you are surprised that the Supreme Court found oxymoronic “same-sex marriage” in the Constitution . . .

. . . then I’m surprised that you are surprised.  Just remember that this is the same organization that said the Constitution gives you the unrestricted right to kill your children at any time for any reason, provided that they are at least 10% inside their mother at the time.  Did you expect logic and fairness from them?

If your church cheers this decision, it isn’t a church.  Get out.

If your church didn’t cheer it, make sure they have a plan in place for when the Gaystapo tries to force them to perform ceremonies for their God-mocking unions.

Remember that God is in control.  Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords and will not be mocked.  Galatians 6:7 Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap.

Keep standing up for the truth.  Those supporting this decision are lost souls who are just performing their job descriptions with incredible precision.  The question is whether we Christians will live out our job description: Being salt and light for a world that desperately needs it.


I wish I was making this up: “Christian” Leftist claims Jesus had gay sex with John.

Right here.

Jesus healed the Roman Centurion’s gay lover. Jesus also loved disciple John in a special way that He did no other.

I pointed out how ridiculous and blasphemous that was.

What does it mean when everytime John is mentioned, that he was the one that Jesus loved? Doesn’t Jesus love all of us? Why the distinction?

This is what you get from the “love=sex” perverts of the “Christian” Left.

Come, Lord Jesus, come.

The “Christian” Left will be defending pedophilia in 3 . . . 2 . . . 1 . . .

See Pedophilia Is Not a Crime, Says Rutgers Prof Margo Kaplan for a taste of what is to come.

The pedophiles are following the LGBTQX game plan.  The “Christian” Left will be supporting them soon — if they aren’t already! — with the same terrible arguments (Jesus never said anything about pedophilia, they were born that way, it is all about love, etc.).  They will shift right along with the world, because they worship and follow the god of this world.

Remember that churchgoers who support “same-sex marriage” have nearly identical views to the world. It shows who their real father is. The “Christian” Left will always mirror the world.  It is one of the ways you can know how fraudulent they are.  And it won’t be any different when the pressure to affirm how “normal and biblical” pedophilia is.

1 John 2:15-16 Do not love the world or the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world—the desires of the flesh and the desires of the eyes and pride of life—is not from the Father but is from the world.

Jude 4 For certain people have crept in unnoticed who long ago were designated for this condemnation, ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into sensuality and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.

Questions for the “Christian” Left and their “Jesus fed all 5,000 – including gays” meme

The wolves of the “Christian” Left are trying to profit off of the Memories Pizza issue, where a mom-and-pop restaurant received death threats and countless hateful and vile messages from the tolerant, loving Left merely for saying they would gladly serve gays but would not participate in a hypothetical “same-sex wedding.”  But is the point of their “When Jesus fed the 5,000 He didn’t ask if there were any guys” meme accurate?  Here are some questions for these false teachers:

1. Will you please show where you have spoken out against the death threats and hate speech directed against these people?  Or are you saying that Jesus would agree with you on those tactics?  Being silent on that would be bad enough, but you actually encourage it.

2. Do you affirm that Jesus really performed the miracle of feeding the 5,000?  (Actually, it was much more than that, as the text notes 5,000 men but there were women and children as well.  But you knew that, right?).  I ask because you “Jesus Seminar” types typically deny and even mock the miracles of the Bible and insist that the authors were blasphemous liars for documenting them.  Is this another case where you pretend to affirm a literal event when it suits you then claim the opposite when it doesn’t?

Example: When you pro-abortion extremists are trying to justify killing children up to their first breath* you affirm a literal Adam.  But you mock that view when pretending Darwinian evolution is real and when denying the doctrine of original sin.  Mark Sandlin denies the resurrection because no one saw the actual event, but his organization uses Adam’s first breath to justify killing 3,500+ human beings each day in this country.

3. If you affirm that Jesus did do this miracle, how do you reconcile that with your heresy that He is not divine?

4. Why do you disagree with Jesus, who clearly defeats Darwinian evolution, oxymoronic “same-sex marriage” and same-sex parenting arguments in one simple passage? No true follower of him should disagree on any of those topics.

Matthew 19:4–5 He answered, “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’?”

Jesus is still asking them that question today, and the answer from the “Christian” Left is, “No, we haven’t read that” — or, rather, “We read that but didn’t like it so we ‘know’ you didn’t really say that.”

5. Do you realize that the 5,000+ were all sinners and that Jesus commanded them to repent and believe?  Or is your claim that because Jesus fed them that they must not need to trust in him for salvation?  Can you see why your meme fails to prove that homosexual behavior isn’t sinful?

6. Do you have any evidence of Jesus participating in or encouraging his followers to participate in pagan ceremonies?  [Crickets chirping]

1 Corinthians 10:18–20 Consider the people of Israel: are not those who eat the sacrifices participants in the altar? What do I imply then? That food offered to idols is anything, or that an idol is anything? No, I imply that what pagans sacrifice they offer to demons and not to God. I do not want you to be participants with demons.

7. Would you make a t-shirt protesting those who wouldn’t participate in wedding of the man and his father’s wife from 1 Corinthians 5?


*The “Christian” Left is far more extreme in their pro-abortion agenda than the average pro-choice person.  They insist that life begins at the first breath and insist that Jesus is fine with killing unwanted children until that point.  I realize how ridiculous their views sound and how many people must think I’m making a straw-man argument.  But that is just because their own words are so clear and extreme: “According to the bible, a fetus is not a living person with a soul until after drawing its first breath.”  More here about how to respond, with full, in-context quotes from them.

Celebrating perversion in the PC(USA) “church”

False teacher Mark “Jesus is not my God” Sandlin literally wept with joy at the latest abomination in his “church.”

My comment left at Love Wins in the PC(USA)! … Or Does It?

What a spectacularly clear picture: God-mocking false teachers literally cheering perversions in the church. Remember that the post above came from Mark “Jesus is not my God” Sandlin, who proudly denies all sorts of essentials of the faith. 

Is it any surprise that someone like him would pervert the word love to celebrate what God calls sin? Here is his life (death?) verse: Jude 4 For certain people have crept in unnoticed who long ago were designated for this condemnation, ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into sensuality and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.

Note how Jesus defeats Darwinian evolution, oxymoronic “same-sex marriage” and same-sex parenting arguments in one simple passage. No true follower of him should disagree on any of those topics.

Matthew 19:4–5 He answered, “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’?”

All over an issue in which the Bible really invests very little time or interest.

That is a weak rhetorical trick used by false teachers. Using that logic, bestiality is no big deal. It also ignores the flip side. The Bible couldn’t be more clear. Bible-believing Christians and even two out of the three types of pro-gay people* (religious or not) can see these truths:

– 100% of the verses addressing homosexual behavior describe it as sin in the clearest and strongest possible terms.

– 100% of the verses referring to God’s ideal for marriage involve one man and one woman.

– 100% of the verses referencing parenting involve moms and dads with unique roles (or at least a set of male and female parents guiding the children).

– 0% of 31,173 Bible verses refer to homosexual behavior in a positive or even benign way or even hint at the acceptability of homosexual unions of any kind. There are no exceptions for “committed” relationships.

– 0% of 31,173 Bible verses refer to LGBT couples parenting children.

Having said that, I believe that Christians should support and encourage those who are fighting same-sex attraction. And no one needs to grandstand on the issue before getting to the Good News of the cross: https://1eternitymatters.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/evangelism-experiences-1/ .

* The three general types of pro-gay theology people: 

1. “The Bible says homosexuality is wrong but it isn’t the word of God.” (Obviously non-Christians)

2. “The Bible says it is wrong but God changed his mind and is only telling the theological Left.” (Only about 10 things wrong with that.)

3. “The Bible is the word of God but you are just misunderstanding it” (Uh, no, not really.)


Even Planned Parenthood agrees that people aren’t “born that way”

Keep this in mind the next time some LGBTQX extremists insist that people can’t change. Via Planned Parenthood: ‘Sometimes a Person’s Sexual Orientation Changes Over Time’:

Planned Parenthood Federation of America tells teens on its website that it “can take a long time” to determine one’s “sexual orientation or gender identity.”

“Sexual orientation describes which gender(s) you’re attracted to, sexually and/or romantically,” says Planned Parenthood’s “All About LGBTQ at a Glance” webpage. “Sometimes a person’s sexual orientation changes over time, but people can’t choose or decided to change who they’re attracted to.”

“It can take many years for people to understand their sexual orientation, and it can change over your lifetime — so a lot of people call themselves questioning, which means they aren’t sure about their sexual orientation and/or gender identity. This is common — especially for teens,” the website states.

Planned Parenthood kills babies for a living, they systematically hide rape, incest and sex trafficking, they encourage kids to have all sorts of out-of-wedlock sex and pretend that it can be done without risks, they would rather destroy a breast cancer charity than part ways amicably, they commit Medicaid fraud, they teach kids the joys of BDSM, and so much more. Their leaders and abortionists get rich off of death and misery, aided by your taxes.  They use some of that money to fund propaganda telling women that if they aren’t willing to kill their children that they can’t be equal in value to men.

Addressing some common “Christian” Left pro-LGBTQX arguments

From the comments at false teacher Mark Sandlin’s recent post.

“You lose points every time you use the phrase “real Christian”… You don’t speak for all Christians, only yourself.”

I don’t care if I lose points with the “Christian” Left — in fact, that’s a good sign if they don’t agree with me! They actively deny the essentials of the faith. Example: They deny that Jesus is the only way to salvation, but that is taught over 100 times in the Bible. Why pick up a book you insist is full of blasphemous lies? https://1eternitymatters.wordpress.com/2014/10/24/should-you-believe-the-authors-of-the-bible-or-the-christians-who-claim-the-writers-were-blasphemous-pathological-liars/

“You most especially cannot speak for God.”

Of course I don’t speak for him in the sense of new revelations, but I can quote him far more accurately than the “Christian” Left. They openly mock his word.

“Use the Bible all you want, but without the original books/letters, all we can do is guess.”

That is demonstrably false and even if it was true, you should be making the same claim against Sandlin and the “Christian” Left. They quote the parts they think they like and claim they are from God. Leopard Theology (aka Dalmatian Theology) is where people claim that the Bible is only inspired in spots and that they are inspired to spot the spots. Then there is Advanced Leopard Theology, where God is also changing spots and adding and removing spots, and, oddly enough, He is only telling theological Leftists and “Progressives.” https://1eternitymatters.wordpress.com/2012/10/30/leopard-theology/

We have thousands of manuscripts from many centuries in many parts of the world, plus the Dead Sea Scrolls, to show us that despite minor differences in spellings and such that we know what the originals said. Even atheist textual critics like Bart Ehrman concede that.

“Allowing same sex marriage will not mean the end of the world. Your life is in no way impacted by same sex marriage.”

No one claimed it would be the end of the world. Our claim is that there are no legitimate reasons for the gov’t to recognize these unions. And as Christians we know that they mock God and that no Christian should support them.

Romans 1:18–20 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse.

Romans 1:26–27 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.

And their recognition by the gov’t inevitably leads to reduced religious freedom, freedom of speech and parental rights. It is happening already and will get worse. Here are 300 examples of the LGBTQX agenda at work — large and small — http://barbwire.com/2014/07/07/300-examples-read-understand-meant-term-homofascism/

Also see what government recognition of “same-sex marriage” did in Massachussetts — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZX55HUPFSU&feature=youtu.be

Secular gays fund United Methodist LGBTQX agenda

One of the many reasons I’m glad I left this denomination.  The good people let the bad people run wild.  And in their ignorance and/or malice, the “Christian” Left pretends that the Koch brothers are the only rich people donating to political causes.

Via Wealthy Caucus Offers to Pay UMC Clergy Who Break Ordination Vows:

Last year alone, RMN received $181,920 from the Arcus Foundation, a grant explicitly given to RMN for the sake of “clergy who engage in acts of ecclesial disobedience in the name of LGBTQ justice and work with coalitions for policy change within the United Methodist Church.” Until last year, another major unofficial liberal United Methodist caucus, the Methodist Federation for Social Action (MFSA), reported that one of its four non-intern staff positions was funded by this same Arcus Foundation. According to a 2008 profile in the Chronicle of Philanthropy, the Arcus Foundation is based on the fortune of billionaire Jon Stryker, a gay activist who has also spent millions on partisan political campaigns, has targeted religious institutions as a key barrier against its own values on LGBTQ liberation, and “gives more than any other grantmaker” does to gay-rights groups.

Rev. Karen Booth, who serves on the UMAction Advisory Board member, has further documented how secular foundations and political groups have heavily financially invested in supporting the efforts of activists seeking to undermine and overturn our denomination’s adherence to the basic Christian sexual ethics demanded by Scripture and our denomination’s official, historic doctrinal standards.


Trans regret

Something is very wrong with transgender people. While some may think that is mean and politically incorrect to say, Captain Obvious says it couldn’t be more factual. If something wasn’t wrong, then why would they want to undergo a radical surgery to change themselves?

The question is whether the body is wrong or whether the mind is wrong. I suggest working on the mind part, which would be much less expensive and destructive.  It is sad to see people mutilate themselves in the hopes that it will make them happier.  It is more sad to see their regret and how they are ostracized by the LGBTQX community in the same way that any ex-gay people are.

If you really love people, you will never encourage their trans desires.

Via Trouble In Transtopia: Murmurs Of Sex Change Regret:

Our culture seems pretty much “to each his own” when it comes to elective bodily mutilation and the regret thereof. And there’s a lot of regret out there. According to a British poll, a whopping 65 percent of those who’ve had various cosmetic surgeries regret it. People who regret their tattoos, plastic surgery, or more extreme body modifications (here’s a sad Buzzfeed pictorial on the effects of ear gauges) can read up on the Internet and find an open array of remedies. Plastic surgeons make money both puttin’ it in and takin’ it out.

Hollywood stars can speak openly about misgivings over their boob jobs and whatnot. Regarding her lip enhancement surgery, Courtney Love said: “I just want the mouth God gave me back.”

But the difference between Love and the guy with phantom penis syndrome is that the guy isn’t allowed to talk about his regret. Not openly. The transgender lobby actively polices and suppresses discussion of sex-change regret, and claims it’s rare (no more than “5 percent.”) However, if you do decide to “de-transition” to once again identify with the sex in your DNA, talking about it will get you targeted by trans activists. So it’s a challenge to understand the scope of regret for sex change surgery. It’s out there, but…

‘It’s Genital Mutilation’

Let’s start with Alan Finch, a resident of Australia who decided when he was 19 to transition from male to female, and in his 20s had genital surgery. But then, at age 36, Finch told the Guardian newspaper in 2004:

. . . transsexualism was invented by psychiatrists. . . .You fundamentally can’t change sex … the surgery doesn’t alter you genetically. It’s genital mutilation. My ‘vagina’ was just the bag of my scrotum. It’s like a pouch, like a kangaroo. What’s scary is you still feel like you have a penis when you’re sexually aroused. It’s like phantom limb syndrome. It’s all been a terrible misadventure. I’ve never been a woman, just Alan . . . the analogy I use about giving surgery to someone desperate to change sex is it’s a bit like offering liposuction to an anorexic.

Finch went on to sue the Australian gender identity clinic at Melbourne’s Monash Medical Center for misdiagnosis. He also was involved in starting an outreach to others called “Gender Menders.” The reaction from the transgender community was fast, furious, and abusive, particularly in the Susans.org discussion forum as described in Sheila Jeffrey’s book, “Gender Hurts.”

Since then, Finch’s outreach website has been archived and there is no further information online. In fact, Finch’s subsequent silence is the norm for those who change their minds. This is perhaps not surprising, given the vigor and vindictiveness of the transgender community in persecuting those who have the temerity to suggest that all is not well in sexual La-La Land. But if you look you can find rogue headlines every now and then that even Hollywood’s fawning over “all things trans” can’t quite control. There’s much evidence that the carefully crafted pictures of transgender “authenticity” and “happiness” are more fiction than fact.

Buried Stories of High-Profile Regret

Rene Richards and Mike Penner remain fairly well known as male-to-female transgenders, the former from the 1970s and the latter recently. Both have stories of misgivings and sorrows that cannot be explained away through the old standard “it’s-society’s-fault” routinely trotted out by the transgender lobby.

Tennis champion Rene Richards was one of the first to go through sex-change surgery and was something of a sensation in the 1970s. As such, you might expect Richards to be a tower of strength, offering encouragement to those in similar circumstances today. Well, not so much. This is what Richards had to say in an excerpt from a March 1999 interview attributed to Tennis Magazine (unavailable in full online):

If there was a drug that I could have taken that would have reduced the pressure, I would have been better off staying the way I was—a totally intact person. I know deep down that I’m a second-class woman. I get a lot of inquiries from would-be transsexuals, but I don’t want anyone to hold me out as an example to follow. Today there are better choices, including medication, for dealing with the compulsion to cross dress and the depression that comes from gender confusion. As far as being fulfilled as a woman, I’m not as fulfilled as I dreamed of being. I get a lot of letters from people who are considering having this operation…and I discourage them all.’ —Rene Richards, “The Liaison Legacy,” Tennis Magazine, March 1999.

I encourage you to read it all.