I’m so glad to see they made this. The trailer looks great. I haven’t been to a movie in over a year, but I may make an exception for this one.
Initially, the government deliberately ignored the greatest serial killer in American history. Fortunately, someone finally took him on. But unfortunately, the media did a choreographed embargo on the trial. I remember searching MSNBC and the LA Times, among other Leftist sites, and getting zero hits for his name. Zero. That is active suppression.
When I would teach pro-life reasoning training to new Care Net Pregnancy Center volunteers I’d ask if they had heard of Kermit Gosnell. Usually only about 25% had — and this was from a group of very committed pro-lifers! The media was very effective at hiding it.
Not surprisingly, Facebook is choking ads for the film. You can only imagine what other suppression Twitter and the rest of Big Tech are engaged in.
Make no mistake: Those Molech-worshiping ghouls love abortion.
Please share the word on this movie! Even if it just gets people to search on the topic it will be worth it.
The pro-abortion media, politicians and falseteachers want to pretend that Kermit Gosnell, convicted baby-killer, was a rogue abortionist. But as you might expect, people who kill babies for a living don’t mind breaking the laws surrounding how to kill babies for a living. And the phonies who pretend that Gosnell is some lone monster are have blood on their hands.
Davis also reveals what Dr. Tucker told her about an event that happened at one of the clinics he ran, a different clinic from the one where he employed Davis.
According to her testimony:
Then one day, Dr. Tucker came back to Alabama, where I was. He had been working in Mississippi. He said, “I had a real hard time in Mississippi, we had a problem and you need to go out and try to calm down the employees.”
I said, “What happened?”
He said, “There was a girl who came in for an abortion. I thought she was eighteen weeks. She ended up being closer to term. I inserted the laminaria and she went into labor. She went into labor and delivered a live, healthy baby.”
I said, “What did you do?”
He said, “What could I do? I killed the baby. But all the employees are really upset, so you need to go and take care of this.”
Remember that technically speaking the crimes of these “doctors” are that they killed the babies a few seconds too late. But all abortions, except the very rare occasions to save the life of the mother, are just as immoral as killing the baby outside the womb. Don’t let people forget that.
And remind them about the media blackout on Gosnell and the rest of these killers.
The pro-abortion media, politicians and falseteachers want to pretend that Kermit Gosnell, convicted baby-killer, was a rogue abortionist. But as you might expect, people who kill babies for a living don’t mind breaking the laws surrounding how to kill babies for a living. And the phonies who pretend that Gosnell is some lone monster are have blood on their hands.
Davis also reveals what Dr. Tucker told her about an event that happened at one of the clinics he ran, a different clinic from the one where he employed Davis.
According to her testimony:
Then one day, Dr. Tucker came back to Alabama, where I was. He had been working in Mississippi. He said, “I had a real hard time in Mississippi, we had a problem and you need to go out and try to calm down the employees.”
I said, “What happened?”
He said, “There was a girl who came in for an abortion. I thought she was eighteen weeks. She ended up being closer to term. I inserted the laminaria and she went into labor. She went into labor and delivered a live, healthy baby.”
I said, “What did you do?”
He said, “What could I do? I killed the baby. But all the employees are really upset, so you need to go and take care of this.”
Remember that technically speaking the crimes of these “doctors” are that they killed the babies a few seconds too late. But all abortions, except the very rare occasions to save the life of the mother, are just as immoral as killing the baby outside the womb. Don’t let people forget that.
A collection of religious groups, including organizations with members from the Methodist Church, United Church of Christ, and Jewish faiths have issued a letter to Congress urging lawmakers to oppose a ban on late-term abortions.
Organized under the banner of the pro-abortion Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, the Methodist Federation for Social Action, United Church of Christ Justice and Witness Ministries, Jewish Council for Public Affairs, National Council of Jewish Women and Union of Reform Judaism all signed their names to a letter opposing H.R.1797, the “District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.”
The term “reproductive choice” is anti-scientific, as all abortions kill human beings who have already been reproduced.
While most people of faith oppose late-term abortions, these groups are opposed to the measure sponsored by Rep. Trent Franks that would ban abortions nationwide after 20 weeks of pregnancy.
“We, the undersigned national religious groups, urge you to oppose H.R.1797, the “District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act” sponsored by Representative Trent Franks (R-AZ), which would create a nationwide ban on access to abortion care 20 weeks after fertilization,” they say in the letter. “We stand united across our faith traditions in opposing this extreme legislation.”
Got that? Killing unwanted babies is not extreme, but opposing it is.
The religious groups join organization like Planned Parenthood and NARAL in blaming pro-life laws for the horrors that took place at Kermit Gosnell’s abortion clinic.
“Proponents of this bill have cited the Kermit Gosnell case as a reason to push this intrusive policy, but the fact is that the lack of access to safe and affordable abortion care is precisely the circumstance that drove women to an unscrupulous person like Gosnell, as it did to so many women before Roe v. Wade. The existence of his clinic is a ghastly warning sign of what happens when abortion is so restricted and expensive that a woman in need feels that she has nowhere else to turn,” they write.’
First, note the deadly euphemism “abortion care.” How big of a Satanic liar do you have to be to call crushing and dismembering an innocent human being “care?”
And then they turn logic upside down and claim that Gosnell’s clinic and all the unenforced laws that were designed to make abortions “safe” are the reason we need more abortions.
“Our religious values call us to offer compassion, support, and respect to a woman and her family facing these difficult circumstances. H.R.1797 will only make a challenging situation worse. When a woman needs an abortion, it is critically important that she have access to safe and legal care,” they add.
Their “values” conveniently ignore the human being who gets chopped up in the process.
Don’t Make it About Barack Obama — He isn’t running for office again and is very unlikely to be impeached. Use his scandal-fest to attack big government and Liberalism, not Obama. That will help in many elections. One of their excuses (read: lies) is that government is too big for Obama to know enough about it. So just agree with them and point out how we need to make it smaller and less intrusive in our lives.
Friendly reminder: If someone uses the “tea bagger” pejorative against you, just ask them what it means. Then point out that they must be homophobic if they are using the slang for a gay sex act to demonize their ideological foes. Shouldn’t the gays be as offended as if they called you the “f” word? Haters!! Hate speech!!
Note that this is also an effective question to ask when someone is punished for using other slurs against homosexuals. I’m not advocating the use of the slurs, of course, but it is worthwhile to point out their hypocrisy. The people reflexively using “tea bagger” are the same ones who go into full pants-wetting mode if someone uses other slurs. For some reason those are worthy of major fines and even the termination of employment, while the Liberals get a pass. Also feel free to ask if those using the term “Santorum” in a derogatory way are “homophobes.”
—
Socialism Leads to D.I.Y. Dentistry in Britain — Ouch. The government can force you to use their insurance plan, but they haven’t figured out how to force people to be dentists. This is the predictable and inevitable results of socialized medicine.
—
Wow, Sojourners finally posted on the Gosnell case! I’m glad to see that. Until now, searching for his name returned zero hits. It is harder to imagine a case more opposed to the “common good.” Killing babies, storing their body parts in jars, unsanitary conditions, pure racism (white women got better treatment than blacks and the clinic mainly targeted blacks), government officials deliberately not enforcing laws, Planned Parenthood knowing of the conditions there yet saying nothing — and then pretending to be aghast at Gosnell, and more.
We should never stop reminding people that Gosnell’s main crimes were killing these babies 30 seconds too late. He did a bad job of killing them before they were completely delivered, so he just finished the job outside the womb. But all abortions are just as immoral.
And he isn’t the “rogue” that this article makes him out to be. People who kill unwanted human beings for a living don’t seem to mind breaking the rules regarding how to legally kill unwanted human beings for a living.
Remember that Obama and Planned Parenthood are on record opposing the obligations of abortionists to save the lives of babies who survive abortion. And Planned Parenthood has been caught countless times hiding statutory rape and sex trafficking, yet they continue to get hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer funding and “social justice” groups not only give them a pass but they support the Democrats’ platform of taxpayer-funded abortions. The right to life should be the foundational principle of “social justice,” not an afterthought — or worse yet, something completely ignored or even opposed.
Flight: The Genius of Birds – Official Trailer — great examples of Intelligently Designed beings.
—
His behavior is getting borderline comical. He dramatically releases Benghazi emails in an attempt to appear cooperative, but the earliest is dates 9/14 when the incident happened on 9/11. Uh, so, either no one sent any emails for 3 days (unbelievable, but very bad if true) or he has good reasons to hide those emails (believable, and a tacit admission of guilt). And then he “fires” the IRS guy who was leaving next month anyway. Great leadership, champ.
Kermit Gosnell is charged with multiple counts of murder and his motley crue of poorly-trained, unprofessional staff has testified to the number of large, live infants he brutally murdered with the snip of scissors in his clinic. The time has come to have a national conversation about sensible abortion control.
“No law or set of laws can keep our children completely safe. But if there’s even one thing we can do, if there’s just one life we can save, we’ve got an obligation to try.”
I agree. We need sensible abortion control. Think of how many classrooms of children lost their lives at the hands of Gosnell. The difference between Gosnell and some other abortionists is that Gosnell was caught. Gosnell didn’t use an AR-15 to snuff out the lives of these live infants. He assaulted them with scissors. Too many to count. There is a photo of one child (via the grand jury testimony) stuffed into a shoebox like a pet hamster. His little legs were too big so they hung out over the sides. Just one life.
Remember, the real issue in the Gosnell case isn’t that he killed babies 30 seconds too late and ran a filthy clinic. Abortionists kill babies for a living, so why would anyone ever be surprised that they would bend the rules on timing, cleanliness, caring for women, etc.?
The real issue is the political and media blackout. Deep down they know that he isn’t that unusual, so they can’t draw attention to the morally insignificant time between legal abortions and infanticide.
And they definitely don’t people to know that President Obama and Planned Parenthood are unequivocally on record for the right of abortionists to kill babies who survive abortions.
Also remember not to let them preach to you about gun control until they address this topic and the media, political and church silence. If they really cared about children they would do something about this instead of consciously ignoring it.
And remember that according to the Left, all of these things and more are obviously racist, but Kermit Gosnell giving preferential treatment to white women when he killed their babies is not. Check.
Professor Calls Republicans Stupid & Racist — among other things. Too bad for him that a student caught it all on camera. I hope this gets other professors to think twice before being so transparently biases. I watched some of it. He’s quite the Liberal mouthpiece. I would love to see retired conservatives audit classes like this and set theses guys straight. Or at least ensure they have some adult supervision.
Remember, people pay tens of thousands of dollars per year to get indoctrinated like this. You do not need his “information” to be a productive member of society or to keep a real job.
—
—
And the theological liberals abuse the word love, as the quote below hints. It isn’t loving to lie about what God said in his word, to offer a beer to an alcoholic, to encourage someone with same-sex attraction to act on those impulses, or to encourage a scared mother to kill her child.
While most media outlets, politicians, pro-abortion groups and falseteachers are still silent on the Kermit Gosnell infanticide case, some have realized that there is no way around it and are trying to feign outrage and hypocritically and falsely blame pro-lifers. It is your basic damage control, but they shouldn’t get away with it in the way Planned Parenthood gets a media pass when busted for hiding statutory rape and sex-trafficking.
Cases in point are the Planned Parenthood Tweet in the image below and a typical “Gosnell was so bad but it is the fault of pro-lifers” nonsense from wolves in sheep’s clothing.
So how do you “out” these people? Simple. Just point to the facts by saying:
1. Kermit Gosnell was pro-late term and “partial-birth” abortion. So are President Obama, the rest of the Democrats* and Planned Parenthood. Do you agree or disagree with them? If you agree with them, why are you and they so outraged at his actions?
2. The main horror of Gosnell was killing babies 30 seconds after it was legal. Planned Parenthood and Obama are both on record as opposing protections for infants who survive abortions. Please explain the moral significance of those 30 seconds and why one is capital murder and one is merely the morally benign or even morally good choice of the mother. Also explain whether you agree with Obama and Planned Parenthood, and why it isn’t hypocritical for PP to complain about Gosnell.
3. Kermit Gosnell was pro-taxpayer-funded abortion. So are President Obama, the rest of the Democrats* and Planned Parenthood. Do you agree or disagree with them? If you agree, then would you concede that forcing pro-lifers to pay for abortions would be more of a pro-abortion position than a pro-choice position?
4. Democrats and Planned Parenthood have aggressively fought the application of health standards and inspections of abortion clinics. This political pressure resulted in even existing laws being ignored by multiple agencies. Isn’t it hypocritical to now blame the Republicans for Gosnell’s safety issues?
5. Given the complete breakdown in oversight over Gosnell’s activities by multiple agencies and that he was only caught by accident by another agency, what makes you think that all the other abortionists run clean clinics and have adequate oversight when killing innocent but unwanted human beings?
6. Given that the Left plays the race card over all sorts of made-up things, why are they ignoring the real racism of Gosnell, and, presumably other abortion clinics — not to mention the fact that abortions kill blacks at a rate three times that of whites and that taxpayer-funded abortions will increase that ratio?
7. As bad as Gosnell was, there weren’t any documented cases of him hiding statutory rape or sex-trafficking as there have been for Planned Parenthood. They broke many laws. Should they be punished to the “full extent” for running a “criminal enterprise” as they have called for in Gosnell’s case? Should they still receive hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer funding?
Please ask those things as nicely as you can to let people have a “dignified surrender” and acknowledge how wrong they are on the greatest moral issue of our time.
Reminder: Keep Tweeting #gosnell as much as you can — such as with this post!
* If you vote for Democrats, you are now pro-abortion, not pro-choice. And not just pro-abortion, but pro-“partial birth” abortion (aka infanticide). From their platform:
The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman’s right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay. We oppose any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right.
If you want to require taxpayer-funded to increase abortions then you aren’t pro-choice, you are pro-abortion. Forcing pro-lifers to pay for abortions = pro-abortion. Wanting to increase the number of abortions = pro-abortion. If you are pro-“partial birth” abortion then you are really pro-legalized infanticide.
If you have a Twitter account, post about #gosnell and ask why there is a media blackout.
Just how many infanticides would an abortionist have to commit before MSNBC and Politico would find it newsworthy? (As noted below, searches for Kermit Gosnell return literally zero items.) CBS had 5 stories on dogs this week and none on Gosnell. How many would he have to commit before President Obama, the Democrats and the falseteachers even acknowledged it, let alone spoke out against it?
Whenever these people bring up gun control, ask them about Gosnell and how much they spoke out against him. [Crickets chirping]
Would the media have covered the Gosnell murder trial if the abortionist had killed the babies with guns? They are milking the Newtown tragedy to destroy our freedoms yet completely ignore these murders. They know it would destroy their “back alley abortion” meme if people knew what happened in front of the alley.
And remember that Planned Parenthood and Obama fought for these killings to be legal.
Great quote about the media blackout on abortionist Kermit Gosnell:
“If Dr. Gosnell had walked into a nursery and shot seven infants with an AR-15, it would be national news and the subject of presidential hand-wringing.” That was the challenging observation made this morning by Rep. Chris Smith, R-NJ, on the floor of the U.S. House.
Because Kermit Gosnell instead allegedly snipped the spinal cords of seven newborn babies in a building called an abortion clinic, the national media has almost uniformly ignored the case, said Smith, something that he charged amounted to a deliberate “cover-up.”
“Will the decades-long major national news media cover-up of the brutality—and violence—of abortion methods ever end?” asked Smith. “Will Americans ever be told the horrifying details as to how—and how often—abortionists dismember, decapitate, and chemically poison innocent babies?”
Kermit Gosnell is currently undergoing trial on charges of murdering seven newborn infants by slitting their spinal cords after failed abortions. Former employees of Gosnell have testified that hundreds of babies – many of them viable – were “aborted” in this way at Gosnell’s “House of Horrors” clinic.
—
Background checks do not get the job done — they sound like a good idea until you actually think about them. They wouldn’t have prevented any of the shootings that people are using to rob us of our Constitutional rights. Criminals won’t obey them. And so on.
As Ann Coulter says, to reduce gun violence you need to to deal with the crazy people (which Democrats aggressively fight) and advance concealed carry rights. At least that’s what all the facts say.
All the actual evidence — mountains of it, in peer-reviewed studies by highly respected economists and criminologists and endlessly retested — shows that limits on magazine capacity, background checks and assault weapons bans will accomplish nothing. Only one policy has been shown to dramatically reduce multiple public shootings: concealed-carry laws.
. . .
For most of the 20th century, from 1900 to 1970, there was an average of four mass public shootings per decade. Throughout the ’70s, as the loony bins were being emptied, the average number of mass shootings suddenly shot up to 13. In the 3.3 decades since 1980, after all the mental institutions had been turned into condos, mass shootings skyrocketed to 36 on average per decade.
Mass shootings don’t correlate with gun ownership; they correlate with not locking up schizophrenics.
And never let the pro-abort gun-grabbers get away with pretending they just want to protect children. These moral freaks think we aren’t killing enough of them in the womb, so they want taxpayer-funded abortions to kill some more.
“Arlene’s Flowers has catered to all patrons, including homosexuals, for many years,” Bristol wrote in his reply to the Attorney General. “Arlene’s Flowers has had openly gay employees.”
He told The Seattle Times that he believes the state is trying to make an example of the flower shop.
“This is about gay marriage, it’s not about a person being gay,” he told the newspaper. “She has a conscientious objection to homosexual marriage, not homosexuality. It violates her conscience.”
Given the current political climate, all new gun control measures must be resisted ferociously, because liberal authoritarians have made clear that they will disarm law-abiding citizens any way they can. Even ostensibly reasonable objectives like keeping firearms away from lunatics are providing cover for tyrannical abuse:
The New York State Police are suspending the handgun permits of people in the state who are prescribed anti-anxiety medication, according to Jim Tresmond of the Tresmond Law Firm in Hamburg, New York. …
“We were flummoxed by this whole matter,” the attorney said. “The HIPPA act is supposed to prevent this kind of thing from happening. It’s a gross invasion of our privacy rights.”
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Privacy Rule establishes national standards to protect individuals’ medical records and other personal health information, according to the Department of Health and Human Services.
Does anyone really trust Big Government to keep information private? If your property belongs to bureaucrats to redistribute as they see fit, so does your medical data.
Make no mistake: You cannot trust the government not to abuse laws like this. They will take your guns at will and the burden of proof will be on you to prove how sane you are.
—
I’ve seen countless critics of Rick Warren be extremly respectful of him and silent in the wake of his son’s suicide, so I was suprised to see this: Rick Warren Uses Pastors.com to Attack Critics in Wake of Son’s Death. Beth Moore was his attack dog here, hypocritically hating on the (alleged) haters and exploiting his son’s suicide to use against his critics. She should know better than to support Warren’s theology, but then again, she’s part of the problem. Just a few of the terms that “loving” Beth used during this period when Warren’s critics (at least the Christians) have been nearly universally silent. Can’t you feel the love and compassion?
Hateful
Relentless
Bullies
Mud slingers
Mean
Careless
Self seeking
Haters
Mockers
Slanderers
Snide
Self serving
Enemies
And Mark Driscoll played the same hypocritical game in attacking Warren’s “attackers.” But is it wrong to point out when a Christian leader does things like endorsing books calling people back to Catholicism?
The government has no money for [fill in the blank], but they have plenty to spread homosexuality abroad. Yes, those are your taxes, doing things that should never be done.
Dr. Kermit Gosnell, an abortionist now on trial in Philadelphia charged with seven counts of first-degree murder–he allegedly cut the spinal cords of late-term aborted babies who were born alive–apparently used to joke about the large size of some the infants he aborted and in one case, according to what a co-worker told the grand jury, said, “This baby is big enough to walk around with me or walk me to the bus stop.”
Gosnell, 72, who ran a multi-million dollar abortion business in West Philadelphia, was arrested on Jan. 19, 2011, and his trial started Monday, Mar. 18, 2013. The first-degree murder counts refer to seven late-term aborted babies who were born alive and then killed, their spinal cords cut with scissors.
Gosnell is also charged with the third-degree murder of a pregnant woman, Karnamaya Mongar, 41, who died after being given a pain killer at Gosnell’s office. He also faces several counts of conspiracy and violation of Pennsylvania’s law against post-24-week abortions.
I was in 24 Hour Fitness at lunch one day and surprised that CNN was actually covering part of this, but my understanding is that the rest of the Leftist media is ignoring it. After all, it doesn’t fit in with their pro-abortion propaganda or these loving abortionists who just want to help women. Interestingly, even the pro-abortion CNN anchor was visibly mystified at a guest’s suggestions for Gosnell’s defense arguments.
In addition, did your media of choice tell you how aggressively President Obama fought to make Gosnell’s actions legal? His battles to permit the killing of babies who survived abortions are well documented.
As has been thoroughly documented with Planned Parenthood, people who kill babies for a living will do all sorts of other evils: Hide statutory rape and sex trafficking crimes, lie, cheat, ignore safety and health regulations and more.
Note that as gruesome as these crimes are, killing a one week old human being in the womb is just as immoral.
Eternity Matters 