Tag Archives: barackobama

Roundup

The Tragedy of the Dumb Church — anti-intellectualism is a huge problem in churches.  The author’s example of churches ignoring apologetics for adults and youth is the same thing I’ve seen at most churches.

More great undercover videos from Lila Rose — She busted Planned Parenthood a few times.  Now she nails other abortionists for admitting what they’d do with babies who survived “botched abortions” (as someone on Facebook noted, is there a more bizarre term than that?  I mean, they are saying, “We tried to kill this defenseless baby and she survived.  What now?!”).

My only internal conflict is that abortions in the womb — whether early or not — are just as evil as infanticide.  These Gosnell et al ghouls seem worse but pro-choices will just dismiss them as being extreme.

Five Tactics for Cheap, Healthy Eating — some good, simple advice.

The Thing About Sex — great article on the biblical perspective.

From an evolutionary perspective sex is little more than a means of spreading genes, of ensuring survival from one generation to the next. From a pornographic perspective, the meaning of sex is physical gratification so that a person’s worth extends no farther than her (or his) ability to satisfy another person’s cravings. From a romantic comedy perspective, sex is a component of an exploratory phase of a relationship and one that precedes expressions of love and loyalty. These are ubiquitous, powerful messages that compete with truth.

A Christian perspective on sex could hardly stand in sharper contrast. There we see that sex belongs to marriage and that marriage has been created by God for a very specific purpose. Before it is anything else, marriage is a picture, a metaphor, of the relationship of Christ and his church. Within that picture, that representation of Christ and his church, we have sex. Sex is a necessary component of marriage so that a couple desiring to live in obedience to the Bible will regularly have sex together (see 1 Corinthians 7:1-5). And here is where we come to your concern. . . .

This is where a Christian understanding of sex is so much better and greater than the alternatives. It heightens the purpose and importance of sex by celebrating all that sex is and all that it is meant to be, for it is here that the physical, the emotional and the spiritual come together in the most powerful way. Literally: the most powerful way. There is nothing in the human experience that brings these three together in such dramatic fashion and this is exactly why sex is reserved for the marriage bed. God wants marriage to be a unique kind of relationship and nothing marks marriage’s uniqueness more than sex.

You Say, This Is History’s Darkest Hour? G. Campbell Morgan Says, Oh, Be Quiet! — Good reminder by Randy Alcorn.  As bad as things seem, in light of history not much has changed.  We have the message of true hope for a world that desperately needs it — just like it always has.

Kermit Gosnell is not an exception.  That’s one of the reasons why the media is suppressing his story.  Relatively speaking, he was more compassionate than this abortionist — Abortion Doctor: I Would Leave Babies to Die Born Alive After Abortion.  At least Gosnell killed them quickly.  

Syrup of Ipecac substitute of the week: Barack Obama to largest abortion provider Planned Parenthood: God Bless You — We shouldn’t be surprised when drivers of unrestricted, taxpayer-funded baby killing blasphemously invoke God’s name to try and sanitize their beliefs. Oddly, he never mentioned Kermit Gosnell during his talk.

Who would have guessed this?  Having female prison guards in male prisons leads to rape, pregnancies and abuse.  Sadly, because of political correctness the leaders must pretend the solution isn’t obvious.  Therefore, they’ll spend a lot of time and money trying to fix the problem with things they know won’t work.  The prison where I do some ministry has female guards.  It always struck me as a combustible situation, and here’ s proof that it is.

Why is DHS stockpiling so much ammo? – Probably an unbelievably wasteful attempt to drive up prices.  Yeah, let’s borrow more money from China during the sequester to throw away like this, while we cancel White House tours and deliberately make air travel less bearable.

Massive Gun Roundup

No, not the Leftist kind, the news kind.

—–

It is tragic how the convergence of malice and naiveté lead to restrictions on people defending themselves against criminals and potentially against their government. The malice is from those who want to disarm you so you can be controlled more easily.  The naiveté is from those who think that utopia is possible in this life.  If you want a perfect place to live, then repent, trust in Jesus and then hurry up and die.  Otherwise, you are stuck here where you have to make trade-offs and adult decisions.  Thinking that disarming the innocent will somehow protect you from evil people is just a false sense of security they are selling you.  Do you not realize that the government is made up of the same kind of greedy, sinful people that populate the rest of society?

The ignorance of history — what has happened in other countries, plus the reasons the 2nd Amendment exists — is a big part of the problem.   And it is unlikely that is an accident, given the political views of most educators.

This can’t be right – I thought the 2nd Amendment was all about hunting . . .

The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.
—Thomas Jefferson

Read more about the original purpose.  And keep in mind that these un-Constitutional proposals are a great way to take attention away from the fact they are rapidly destroying the country by borrow half of what we spend.  This can’t last, folks.

Most agree that some people shouldn’t have guns. Please restore the ability to get nuts off the street (see Guns don’t kill people, the mentally ill do). But silliness about rounds and calibers should be done away with. You need to have at least one more round than the bad guys have.

I have a few follow up questions for the Obama-prop 8 yr. olds used in the President’s press conference: Do you know what the 2nd Amendment is and why the Founding Fathers included it in the Bill of Rights?

If bad people came to your house with guns and the only way to save the lives of your family was to defend yourself with guns, would you want to have you and your family die rather than to stop the nice President from taking your guns away?

Do you think your Mom should have had the right to have you killed before you were born?  Or if you survived the abortion, should it have been legal for the doctor to just let you die?  Because Mr. Nice Guy Constitutional Scholar Won’t-Someone-Please-Think-of-the-Children President Obama not only thinks that your moms had a right to abortion, but the right to a dead baby, and he thinks that if they couldn’t have afforded to kill you that people who oppose abortion should have had to pay for it.

Now back to the President: Please tell us more about how our first task as a society is to keep our children safe.

The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.
Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler, Publ. Houghton Miflin, 1943, Page 403

Why are the anti-gun people so anti-women?  Don’t they want women to be able to protect themselves from rapists and abusers?  Do you think that gang-rape in India could have been prevented if someone had been armed?  That is one of millions of examples.  It isn’t that you have to carry a gun, but that the bad guys don’t know if you have a gun.  If Obama & Co. get their wishes, they’ll know we are unarmed.

Violent crime rate more than doubled in the four years after the 1997 UK gun ban.

Take a lesson from Canada: gun registries are later used to confiscate guns

What happened when Australian citizens had to turn in their guns?

An easy way to contact all your political leaders and tell them not to promote un-Constitutional laws.  Just a few clicks and they’ll know where you stand.

Five Facts to Fire at the Gun-Grabbers

1. Gun violence has been declining.
2. Despite the politically driven hype, mass shootings are not becoming more frequent.
3. Schools are safer than they were.
4. There are more guns out there, despite (or more likely, causing) the decline in gun violence.
5. “Assault weapons” bans have no effect on crime or violence.

A must-see video about how the Democrats and media “elites” mock and dismiss anyone who disagrees with them, even while ignoring that many people support these actions and that those hypocrites have armed guards at the schools of their children. 

Too bad the Republicans don’t put out ads like this.

Man shoots robbery suspect to protect his 2-year-old son – Why didn’t Obama bring this family to his press conference?  Why doesn’t the media trumpet all the self-defense stories that save lives every day?

Why doesn’t the media tell you 24×7 about the mass shootings that never were, because an armed citizen saved the day?

Here are a “few” more:

Ann Coulter lists just a few examples of guns in the hands of bystanders saving lives by stopping massacres:

—Mayan Palace Theater, San Antonio, Texas, this week: Jesus Manuel Garcia shoots at a movie theater, a police car and bystanders from the nearby China Garden restaurant; as he enters the movie theater, guns blazing, an armed off-duty cop shoots Garcia four times, stopping the attack. Total dead: Zero.

—Winnemucca, Nev., 2008: Ernesto Villagomez opens fire in a crowded restaurant; concealed carry permit-holder shoots him dead. Total dead: Two. (I’m excluding the shooters’ deaths in these examples.)

—Appalachian School of Law, 2002: Crazed immigrant shoots the dean and a professor, then begins shooting students; as he goes for more ammunition, two armed students point their guns at him, allowing a third to tackle him. Total dead: Three.

—Santee, Calif., 2001: Student begins shooting his classmates — as well as the “trained campus supervisor”; an off-duty cop who happened to be bringing his daughter to school that day points his gun at the shooter, holding him until more police arrive. Total dead: Two.

—Pearl High School, Mississippi, 1997: After shooting several people at his high school, student heads for the junior high school; assistant principal Joel Myrick retrieves a .45 pistol from his car and points it at the gunman’s head, ending the murder spree. Total dead: Two.

—Edinboro, Pa., 1998: A student shoots up a junior high school dance being held at a restaurant; restaurant owner pulls out his shotgun and stops the gunman. Total dead: One.

Here are a couple more:

—Muskegon, Michigan: From the Aug. 23, 1995, issue of the Muskegon Chronicle: “Plans to slay everyone in the Muskegon, Michigan, store and steal enough cash and jewelry to feed their ‘gnawing hunger for crack cocaine’ fell apart for a band of would-be killers after one of their victims fought back. Store owner Clare Cooper was returning behind the counter after showing three of the four conspirators some jewelry, when one of the group pulled out a gun and shot him four times in the back. Stumbling for the safety of his bullet-proof glass-encased counter, Cooper managed to grab his shotgun and fire as the suspects fled.”

—Colorado Springs, Colo.: On Dec. 9, 2007, gunman Mathew Murray, 24, launched an armed attack against the parishioners of the New Life Church that ultimately left two innocent victims dead. But the toll could have been much higher, were it not for the heroic actions of former police officer Jeanne Assam from Minnesota. In an interview she said she very nearly decided not to go to church that morning but because she saw a headline on her computer indicating that two young people were murdered and a training center for Christian missionaries about 70 miles away in the Denver suburb of Arvada, she changed her mind. Murray shot a total of five people before an armed Assam shot and killed him. There were about 7,000 people at the church at the time of the attack.

This is why mass murders virtually always occur in gun-free zones. Only the most clueless liberals don’t know this. Despite the phony tears and sanctimonious rhetoric, they could not care less about preventing mass murders. Their only objective, other than to steal our money, is to snuff out liberty.

—-

Why do you need high-capacity magazines? – Again, you need one more round than all the bad guys after you.  And they generally don’t schedule their assaults against you and let you know how much firepower they are bringing, so you should be able to have all you like.

You definitely don’t want to have a gun if someone like this comes after you – right?  Because people like that would never harm you physically.

Great exposure of the hypocrites who “outed” lawful gun owners but don’t want to tell people that they don’t have guns (or worse yet, they actually own guns!).

And finally, the Queen of Hypocrisy, Diane Feinstein, who carried a gun herself but admits that she will disarm us all as soon as she has the votes.

“If I could’ve gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them — Mr. and Mrs. America turn ‘em all in — I would have done it. I could not do that. The votes weren’t here.”

False teacher hypocrisy for Memorial Day

False teacher Chuck Currie just can’t kick his hypocritical race baiting.  See What’s On Right Wing Talk Radio? Bigoted Paranoia

Evangelicals, Mainline Christians and Roman Catholics have repeatedly condemned those who question the president’s Christian faith for partisan political reasons

I am now convinced that Chuck has a template with this fallacy already typed in.  Just because some people in those groups hold that view, he pretends that all do. Sure, Chuck.

And look here how Obama’s former UCC minister notes that church wasn’t the Obama’s “thing” and how he isn’t even sure Obama is a Christian.  Think about that: Obama’s multiple-decade UCC minister said those things.  And if you can’t trust a UCC minister, who can you . . . oh, wait, bad example — Chuck’s a UCC “minister!”

We can expect opponents of the president this election – big and small – to attempt to exploit racial divisions and to paint President Obama as something “other” than fully as American.

Uh, maybe that is because Obama himself claimed to be born in Kenya?  I don’t think he was born there.  I think he’s a liar, like Chuck, who will say anything to advanced his cause.

Consider the new racially charged film financed by right-wing billionaire Joe Ricketts that suggests that the president has a Kenyan, not American, world-view.

Looks like Chuck, along with the rest of the mainstream media, hasn’t read Obama’s writings (at least those that he didn’t have sealed out of his paranoia).

These campaigns against President Obama are driven by fear, hatred and racism – let’s be honest.

Oh, good, Chuck switched over to honesty mode!  Here’s some real honesty: Chuck is dishonest and the biggest racist of all, favoring taxpayer-funded abortions that will increase the 3x rate of black abortions to whites.

False teachers vs. false teachers — this should be fun!

False teacher Chuck “Jesus is not the only way” Currie has one of those even-a-blind-squirrel-finds-a-nut-now-and-then moments when he rightly criticizes preachers who wish violence upon gays, such as Democrat Fred Phelps* 

Via Killing Off Homosexuals And Other Anti-Christian Teachings.

All Christians – regardless of whether or not we support gay marriage (I strongly do) – must condemn hate speech from pastors and denominations where this occurs are obligated to hold their clergy accountable – taking away their status as ordained clergy. Because let’s be clear: these hateful men are not preaching the word of God.

The problem is that this is just one type of false teacher — and a proven liar at that — criticizing another type of false teacher.  Chuck is blind to the word of God.  Just listen to any of his sermons and you can know that.  But he rightly notes that those other preachers are wrong.  Chuck just lives out his false dichotomy, that you are either like Chuck or like the other type of haters.

If you really love gays, you won’t lie to them and tell them that there aren’t serious spiritual, emotional and physical consequences to their behavior.  And you also won’t wish that they’d be killed.  You’ll tell them the truth, and you’ll welcome them in your church — provided that they aren’t their to rebel against God’s word but to be changed by it.

The truth is out there, but you won’t find it with Chuck or with preachers like Democrat Fred Phelps*.

* Did I mention that Fred Phelps is a Democrat, just like Chuck Currie?  Because he is.

Wow — Obama’s former pastor says “church was not their thing” — plus lots more!

Wow.  Just wow.  Am I surprised?  Not that it was said, but that this has finally come out.  I wonder how the UCC spokespeople like race-baiting Chuck “Jesus is not the only way” Currie will try to spin this?

See Rev. Jeremiah Wright Speaks Out About Obama, Politics & More and listen to the audio yourself.  This is just the tip of the iceberg.  Now I can see why Chuck & Co. have not been playing the religion card on Romney.  They are working overtime to keep religion out of it.

Wright also made some intriguing claims about the Obama family and its purported lack of interest in attending church. Since assuming office, the president has consistently faced criticism over his infrequent church attendance. According to Wright, this is par for the course.

“Church is not their thing. It was never their thing,” Wright says of Barack and Michelle Obama. “She was not the kind of black woman whose momma made her go to church, made her go to Sunday school…so the church was not an integral part of their lives before they got married — after they got married.”

After Wright made these comments, Klein said, “But the church was an integral part of his politics…because he needed that base.” Wright agreed with this statement, at one point saying “correct.”

 

Chuck Currie still falsely attributing comments to conservatives

See Liberal group tries to silence Religious Freedom to lean about Chuck “Jesus is not the only way” Currie doing what he does best.

“Reverend” Chuck Currie thought it clever to take a screenshot of my tweet, and write a blog post about me. His intent was obvious. Smear my name to try and make the Stand Up Rally irrelevant. It had the opposite effect. One doesn’t have to look far to see where Chuck’s allegiance lies, and it’s not with Christian intention and definitely not with God. Check out his blog, and find many articles praising Obama, Obamacare, attacking Conservatives, and so on. When I tried to defend myself on his blog, he censored me, and also edited my words to smear me even more. The following on his comment board I did NOT write: “I will never apologize for my actions. I stand by them with Conviction. Every word I spoke of is true.”

Wow, Chuck never learns! He did the same thing to me, deleting a comment then falsely attributing words to me. I don’t know how he sleeps at night knowing what a fake he is. Sure, he can masquerade in a false church like the UCC and on the Huffington Post, but deep down he knows he’s a fraud, and he knows we know it.

This is the face of the UCC and theological liberalism.  Should we be surprised that pro-abortion, pro-“same-sex marriage,” anti-Jesus’ divinity, anti-Jesus’ exclusivity, anti-biblical authority “reverends” would stoop to such petty lying?

He’s still lying.

First, where is the ACLU?  After all, Obama is seeking to force his religious beliefs on the country.  Oh, wait, they only protest religious views they disagree with — which means that they aren’t opposed to religious views in principle.  They just use that as a tool to suppress free speech.

Second, is this a coincidence?  Obama openly supports gay marriage: 48 hours after top gay donors cut off funding.  And note how it takes the focus off the economy.  Be sure to end any conversation about this with a reminder of how bad our financial situation is.

As Haemet notes, “same-sex marriage” is still not banned anywhere in the U.S.  You should immediately question anyone making that claim, because they are misinformed and/or disingenuous.  And they are probably hateful and ignorant of polygamists and those who practice bestiality.  At least that’s what they say about anyone who disagrees with them about the historic view that marriage is a union of a man and a woman.  They’ll be shocked that you would say that, but they are just pulling up the drawbridge and hating on anyone who doesn’t think just like they do.  You need to be as liberal as them or you are a bigoted hater, but not any more liberal than them or you are a pervert.  Got it?

Make no mistake, Obama didn’t evolve on “same-sex marriage,” he devolved back to his 1996 position because it was costing him campaign contributions. The impatience of the LGBTQX lobby may have cost him the election and the sure support of SSM he would have given after the election.

He has been doing everything imaginable to advance their agenda, including ignoring the Defense of Marriage Act (which the Left was happy about but ignored the dangerous precedent — picture President Bush arbitrarily not enforcing Roe v Wade) and exporting perversions to other countries (we are withholding aid from poor countries unless they go pro-gay).

By the way, he is still lying.  He has no intention of leaving it to the States.  He’ll do the same power grab he did with the Defense of Marriage Act.

Let’s analyze what he said, via Obama endorses gay ‘marriage’: says support based on Jesus, Golden Rule:

WASHINGTON, D.C., May 9, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) – President Barack Obama has flip-flopped on gay “marriage” for the second time, endorsing same-sex marriage in an interview today, in which he said his decision was motivated in part by his Christian faith and his belief in the Golden Rule.

This is such a transparent political fundraising stunt.  That is bad enough, but for him to blame it on Jesus is sickening.  Why is he forcing his (false) religious beliefs on us?

Remember, this is the same “Christian” who is not only pro-partial birth abortion but anti-Born Alive Infant Protection Act and who was a devoted follower of Jeremiah Wright (until it cost him something).

“We are both practicing Christians and obviously this position may be considered to put us at odds with the views of others,” Obama stated,

Yes, “others” like God.

“but, you know, when we think about our faith, the thing at root that we think about is, not only Christ sacrificing Himself on our behalf, but it’s also the Golden Rule.”

That is nonsense and could justify almost anything.

However, Obama had previously implied the Bible supports homosexual unions. “I believe in civil unions that allow a same-sex couple to visit each other in a hospital or transfer property to each other,” he said in 2008. “If people find that controversial, then I would just refer them to the Sermon on the Mount, which I think is, in my mind, for my faith, more central than an obscure passage in Romans.”

Only a pagan could find Romans 1 to be obscure.  It is one of the most “big picture” books of the Bible.  And the Sermon on the Mount says nothing about oxymoronic “same-sex marriage.”

The president told the media his newly articulated position represents his private views, and that he believes each state should make its own decisions about marriage. However, he has publicly opposed state initiatives to define marriage as the union of a man and a woman in North Carolina and Minnesota.

What — you mean he already broke his word?  And anyone who says he won’t change once again about Federal involvement is naive or lying.

Fox News anchor Sheppard Smith greeted the president’s statement by saying, “President Obama, now in the 21st century.”

What a tool.

“Malia and Sasha, they have friends whose parents are same-sex couples,” he added.

So if his kids are friends with polygamists, pedophiles, people who have sex with animals, etc., then Barry will change?  Or will not being willing to change make him a bigoted hater?

In today’s statement, Obama appeared to flip-flop on the issue of marriage for a second time. In 1996, while running for Illinois state senate against Alice Palmer, Barack Obama filled out a questionnaire from the homosexual activist group IMPACT stating, “I favor legalizing same-sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages.” His aides later disavowed it.

As a U.S. Senate candidate in 2004, running against Alan Keyes, Obama said, “I’m a Christian. I do believe that tradition and my religious beliefs say that marriage is something sanctified between a man and a woman.” He maintained that position in the 2008 presidential race.

That’s because he’s lying.

Obama’s likely 2012 rival Mitt Romney clarified his position in return, saying, “My view is that marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman…I don’t intend to make any adjustments at this point – or ever, by the way.”

One more reason to vote for Mitt.

But we shouldn’t be surprised with Obama.  Remember, Obama’s UCC is the denomination of Jeremiah Wright and Chuck Currie, who makes ridiculous posts saying that President’s Call For Marriage Equality Consistent With Christian Ethics.  Well, gee, if Chuck “Jesus is not the only way” Currie says it then it must be true!  He had this LOL:

Discrimination is contrary to the will of God.

Really now?  Chuck is going to tell us about the will of God?  This is the “reverend” that denies that Jesus is the only way to salvation, which is only mentioned 100+ times in the Bible.  And he prattles on about the “least of these” but it pro-taxpayer-funded abortions.  You can’t make this stuff up.  Theological Liberals have no conscience on these things.

If those claiming the name of Christ want to disagree with the clear teachings of the Bible, their own denomination and 2,000 years of church history, then the burden of proof is on them to explain why the rest of us are wrong.  Yet in my experience the “pro-gay Christians” just go by their emotions or offer up one logical fallacy after another (e.g., “Jesus never said anything about it, so it must be OK.”)  I have more respect for non-believers.  At least they are clear about being my spiritual enemy.

And don’t miss Pastor Foster’s letter to Obama