Tag Archives: alyssa milano

Alyssa Milano killed two of her children, so she’s a hero or something

I have great news for women who have had abortions: Forgiveness and healing is available if your repent and trust in the real Jesus.  But I will mock those who are proud of their child-killing.

I mentioned this in a Roundup but it was so ridiculous and fallacy-filled that it deserves a full post: Alyssa Milano opens up about having two abortions: ‘I knew I was not ready to be a parent’

Remember, we on the pro-science, pro-logic side always start with the irrefutable truth that a new human child is created at fertilization.  At least that’s what all those pesky mainstream embryology textbooks and the nice people at Dictionary.com say.

Actress and women’s rights activist Alyssa Milano opened up about having two abortions in 1993 because she was not “ready to be a parent” after becoming pregnant while taking birth control pills.

Alyssa killed two living children, so she was already a parent.  Whether she was “ready” or not is irrelevant.  If she didn’t feel equipped to parent them properly, then she could have given them up for adoption instead of killing them.  But that didn’t fit with her career goals.  The article doesn’t even hint that she considered adoption.

Milano spoke of her experience on the latest episode of her podcast entitled “Sorry Not Sorry” released Monday.

I’ve done prison ministry for 13 years and have met countless felons who are not sorry for their crimes.  But they are still guilty, just like she is guilty of killing her children. Her seared conscience is not evidence of her innocence — or, as she is trying to present it, her virtue of killing her children.

“I’m Alyssa Milano and I’ve had an abortion. I control my own body,” she said.

Only a Molech-worshiping Leftist can turn child-killing into a virtue.  Yeah, she controlled her body — and the bodies of her children — right into the trash.

“I still got pregnant,” she said. “It was devastating. I was raised Catholic and was suddenly put in conflict with my faith — a faith I was coming to realize empowered only men to make every single decision of what was allowed and what was not allowed,” Milano said.

Gee, what a strong and reasoned faith she had.  So it wasn’t that she had sex out of wedlock and logical consequences followed, it was that men are bad, her faith was false and she had to kill her children. [Yeah, her faith was false, but for 95 other reasons.]

The “Who’s the Boss” star said she wanted to focus on her budding film career.

Well in that case, of course she had to kill her children!

“I knew at that time I was not equipped to be a mother and so I chose to have an abortion. I chose,” Milano said, adding that she faced “crippling anxiety” during that time period. “It was my choice and it was absolutely the right choice for me. It was not an easy choice.”

Again, she was already a mother.  And yes, I can see how choosing to kill your children might make you anxious.  It was all about her, not her children.

“It was not something I wanted, but it was something that I needed, like most health care is.”

Now there is some extra-delusional rationalization.  As usual, Leftists put the wants of adults over the needs of children – including the need to live – but they frame their wants as needs.  No, Alyssa, you did not need to kill your children.

And abortion is the opposite of health care.  Health care is when humans don’t get crushed and dismembered.

After terminating her first pregnancy, Milano said on the podcast that she continued with her previous sexual relationship and use of birth control pills.

Slow learner.  But we should definitely do whatever she says anyway.

“A few months later, I found out I was pregnant again. I had done what I knew to do to prevent pregnancy and was still pregnant, so once again I made the right decision to end that pregnancy,” she said.

So instead of learning from her mistakes and telling people to only have sex in a one man / one woman marriage, she kills another child.  And of course it was the right decision, because she said it was.  She was having fun with the extramarital sex so killing her children was worth it.

Milano told her audience that she would not have her acting career or her activist platform had she not made the decision to get abortions.

Yep.  If she hadn’t killed her children she wouldn’t have time to tell other women how important it is to be able to kill their children.

“Fifteen years after that first love had fizzled, my life would be completely lacking all its great joys,” she said. “I would never had been free to be myself — and that’s what this fight is all about: freedom.”

More delusion.  Yeah, she’s some kind of super hero, fighting for freedom by slaughtering her own children.  But aren’t we all glad for her great joys?! Oddly, I’m not getting all choked up here.

She went on to say that she would not have been able to have her two “beautiful, perfect, loving, kind and inquisitive children” with husband David Bugliari.

Yeah, because she knew the two children she killed would have been ugly, imperfect, unkind and non inquisitive . . . or something.  They obviously deserved what they got.

What if this husband cheats on his child-killing wife and they get divorced? Does that mean these living children will be retroactive “mistakes?”

And I wonder how her living children really feel about this.  Of course they would publicly defend their mother, but deep down wouldn’t it bother them that she was a cold-blooded killer of their step-siblings?

Milano has spearheaded efforts to push back against strict abortion bans passed by several Republican-majority state legislatures in recent months, including a bill that banned abortions once a fetus has a detectable heartbeat in Georgia.

How noble!  Who cares if the children have beating hearts?  If mommy wants them dead then they need to be killed – and you all should have to pay for it!

Milano also called for a sex strike in response to the Republican Party’s “undeniable war on women.” 

I love how she got roasted for noting that not having out-of-wedlock sex would reduce abortions.  Hey, we agree!  I don’t think Alyssa is playing 4-D chess here.

And one day some of these old, lonely, childless women will realize that the real “war on women” was waged by the Left.  They’ll regret buying the lie that having sex with lots of men and killing their offspring was such a bright idea, especially when no one wanted to wife them up once they hit the “wall.”

“I refuse to let anyone else’s bullshit morality force me into a life of premarital celibacy. I refuse to live in the narrative that sexual pleasure is for men and that women exist to deliver that pleasure,” she said on her abortions on the podcast. “Nobody will say that he was at fault for enjoying sex with me, but you can be damned sure that the men enacting these laws think less of me for deriving the same pleasure from him.”

Her straw-man arguments to excuse her sluttiness are pathetic.  I know a “few” Republicans and can’t think of one that wants to deny sexual pleasure to women.  But even if that wasn’t a lie, it is a silly non sequitur to pretend that anti-abortion laws aren’t really about saving the lives of children.

In summary, this professional Leftist insists that killing two of her children was noble but Republicans are mean.  Duly noted.

Responding to the pro-abortion rape/incest argument

With several states doing the right thing and challenging Roe v Wade on its “personhood” distinction, it is a great time to be prepared to calmly and clearly refute pro-abortion sound bites.

Pro-abortion people exploit rape and incest victims to advance their child-killing cause, and they are joined by many pro-lifers who either haven’t thought the issue through carefully or are too scared to make the argument.  They try to paint you as evil for not wanting rape and incest victims to “solve” their problems by killing any children produced during the crimes, but it is false compassion and a red herring because they don’t just want to keep those abortions illegal.  They want all abortions to be legal, up to the child’s first breath.

Don’t shy away from that issue, just respond as follows.

I’m glad you brought up the topic of rape and incest. Those are terrible crimes that we should seek to prevent, and we should ensure that the victims aren’t further victimized and that there is justice for the rapists. If you propose the death penalty for the rapist I’d consider that, but why is it the first option for the innocent child? It is a scientific fact that the unborn are human beings from fertilization.

Abortionists such as Planned Parenthood help hide the crimes. They have been caught countless times hiding statutory rape, incest (which is another form of rape) and sex trafficking. If you really care about rape, then protest Planned Parenthood and how they systematically hide statutory rape and sex trafficking.

Unless you can look at an ultrasound and tell if a child was the product of rape or incest, then you shouldn’t let them be killed.

Abortion doesn’t undo the trauma of rape, it compounds it. It is another way of a stronger person abusing a weaker person.

Rapes results in less than 1% of abortions. Those abortions are still wrong, but for the record, would you oppose outlawing all abortions, except those in the cases of rape, incest and to save the life of the mother? If not, then why not admit that you are really just pro-abortion and that you use the rape/incest card to advance your cause?  Stop exploiting rape victims to justify abortion.


Here’s a handy jpeg you can use on social media.

Alyssa Milano’s “sex strike”

It must be exhausting to be a God-mocking, Molech-worshiping Leftist.  You have to prop up all sorts of evil, inconsistent and anti-science ideas all day, every day.  Exhibit A: Alyssa Milano, who called for a “sex strike” by women because some states are saying you can’t kill children with beating hearts.

She was quickly and thoroughly roasted on social media for proving the point of every conservative ever, namely that abstinence works!  Mike Pence will be glad to know Alyssa has joined his side.  And I’m sure her children are comforted knowing that mommy fought aggressively for the right to have been able to kill them.

She also got in trouble with professional feminists who rightly noted that Milano was implying that sex was just a weapon used by women to manipulate men.  Apparently Milano doesn’t really enjoy sex, she just uses it to get what she wants and needs to be able to kill an unfortunate children created by her transaction.

Predictably, she trotted out the anti-science “reproductive rights” canard.  For the 397th time, abortion kills children who have already been reproduced.  Is that so hard to understand?  If they hadn’t been reproduced you wouldn’t have anything to murder!

And of course, she had to apologize to the inevitable “trans” (note: still not a real thing) people with some unintelligible complaints about cisgender or the like.

Never forget that the #1 issue in life for feminists is being able to kill their children up to their first breath and without anesthetic.  Oh, and even beyond that if the abortion fails to kill the child.  Because they insist that the Constitution doesn’t just give you a right to abortion but to a dead baby.

There is a reason they are indistinguishable from the “Christian” Left, whose god says it is OK to kill children to their first breath.  These are the real extremists, as most self-identified pro-choice people – and most Leftist countries – oppose late-term abortions.

Hopefully many women will heed her advice and stop having out-of-wedlock sex and realize how much better life is when doing things God’s way.  The Bible teaches the original “sex strike” — no sex until a one man / one woman marriage.  And the world would be a vastly better place if people heeded that.