UPDATE: I wrote this well before the Colorado shootings, but could have said the same things about how PP is trying to raise funds off of it.
Child-killing ghouls like Planned Parenthood and “Christian” Leftist Hillary Clinton have no shame. While cycling your tax dollars between themselves*, they tweet things like this:
Every child deserves the opportunity to live up to their God given potential. @HillaryClinton #blacklivesmatter— Planned Parenthood (@PPact) November 15, 2015
Yet PP is the #1 child-killer in the United States. Second place isn’t even close.
And Hillary & PP & the “Christian” Left have latched onto the “Black Lives Matter” radicalism while promoting the abortions that kill black lives at a rate five times that of whites.
*Hillary & Co. send your tax money to Planned Parenthood, who sends some to Hillary & Co., and so on.
Eternity Matters 
The irony is when a psychotic man is allowed to own a gun and he uses it to kill and injure humans in a PP and the crazed self righteous blind religious fanatics applause him. When a police officer serving his community will not be coming home to his family for the holidays because of this guy… Please continue to show your support for him. Let the world see who you really are.
LikeLike
I don’t follow. I don’t know any fanatics who applauded him, but I know countless pro-lifers who denounced him.
If you really cared about injuring humans you’d protest PP all day long — http://tinyurl.com/yzjq4lv http://www.advocatesoflife.com/graphicabortionimages.htm
LikeLike
Would you say that you disagree with a specific process of Plan Parenthood? Or disagree with all that PP does and the employees that work there to support them and their families?
I feel that activists have attached their agenda to the PP entity and totally forget that they are trying to stop fetal abortion.
There should in no way be death threats or killings at any PP location. The activists that disagree with the specific process performed (that is legal mind you) should be taking there dispute to the elected officials that they put in office to fight for their beliefs.
PP gets a bad wrap because they legal perform a procedure that is currently approved by government. Take this to congress and have them fix it.. Oh yeah. There is no activity in congress.
Why don’t we have congress outlaw condoms, or outlaw the morning after pill, or outlaw any substance in the world that may decrease the chances of conception. It’s always a matter of what our level of tolerance is. What we say is “going to far”.. Should we outlaw anything that stops the miracle of conception from naturally taking place? Or just stop the ones that seem to be slightly more barbaric? Just thoughts.
LikeLike
“Would you say that you disagree with a specific process of Plan Parenthood? “
Yes, the child-killing, the rapist-protecting, the child-perverting, etc.*
“Or disagree with all that PP does and the employees that work there to support them and their families?”
Pretty much all of it. And the “support their families” argument is pretty pathetic. They should find a better way to support their families thankilling children.
“I feel that activists have attached their agenda to the PP entity and totally forget that they are trying to stop fetal abortion.”
You “feel” that but it is false. Taking away their taxpayer funds and prosecuting them for hiding rapists would be a great start.
“There should in no way be death threats or killings at any PP location.”
Haha – we agree! But you tripped yourself up by ignoring that they kill for a living – http://tinyurl.com/yzjq4lv http://www.advocatesoflife.com/graphicabortionimages.htm
So yes, please work with us to stop abortion and stop the killings at the PP locations!
“ The activists that disagree with the specific process performed (that is legal mind you) should be taking there dispute to the elected officials that they put in office to fight for their beliefs.”
1. We do. 2. The “if legal, then moral” bit is for illogical cowards.
“PP gets a bad wrap because they legal perform a procedure that is currently approved by government.”
More “if legal, then moral” nonsense. Yes, they get a bad rap for killing children, selling their body parts for profit, lying, hiding rapists, etc.
“Why don’t we have congress outlaw condoms,”
Because those don’t kill children.
“or outlaw the morning after pill,”
Good idea! Those kill human beings who have been reproduced.
“or outlaw any substance in the world that may decrease the chances of conception.”
No, that isn’t necessary, because we are protesting killing human beings after conception. You are just using silly emotional arguments.
“ It’s always a matter of what our level of tolerance is. What we say is “going to far”.. “
Ugh. Ghouls like you tolerate this – http://tinyurl.com/yzjq4lv http://www.advocatesoflife.com/graphicabortionimages.htm
“Should we outlaw anything that stops the miracle of conception from naturally taking place? Or just stop the ones that seem to be slightly more barbaric? Just thoughts.”
They don’t “seem” more barbaric, they are more barbaric. You conflate preventing conception with killing the products of conception. Are you that ignorant of scientific facts? http://www.abort73.com/abortion/medical_testimony/
* Planned Parenthood kills unwanted children for a living, they systematically hide rape, incest and sex trafficking, they encourage kids to have all sorts of out-of-wedlock sex and pretend that it can be done without risks, they would rather destroy a breast cancer charity than part ways amicably, they commit Medicaid fraud, they teach kids the joys of BDSM, they sell body parts of dead babies for profit then lie about it, and so much more. Their leaders and abortionists get rich off of death and misery, aided by your taxes. They use some of that money to fund propaganda telling women that if they aren’t willing to kill their children that they can’t be equal in value to men. https://1eternitymatters.wordpress.com/2011/04/08/planned-parenthood-overview/
LikeLike
I truly am not an emotional person about any subject. Thus making it hard for others to have intelligent conversations with me. Let’s say this as a scenario. You based on your beliefs, do not agree with what PP is doing. So because of this you are going to tell the world what is allowed and not allowed. You want to make the rules. Now let’s say this as a scenario. People that do not share your beliefs say that it is illegal for you to believe in what you believe in. Hundreds if not more people are killed around the world in the name of religion and beliefs.
The problem is that we are all right and it’s our way and nothing else matters. Who decides when life starts? Who decides that sperm is not a form of life and any form of stoping it from doing what was naturally intended for it is not murder?
Have you had any type of non emotional, intellectual conversation with the doctors of PP? You speak of scientific proof.. But is this something you have read? And is the author qualified to make these types of claims? If you feel they are, where did they develop this knowledge of when life begins? I am not emotionally invested in this topic as much as I want to know the truths from both sides.
Please give me non bias content to research.. Because I would love to learn more.
Thanks.
LikeLike
If you really want to be better educated on this, then go to http://www.abort73.com and go through their basic reasoning. Start at the bottom with 1. Medical reasoning then go from there.
“You want to make the rules.”
No kidding. That’s a really bad argument on your part. Do you have any idea how many thousands of laws there are on the books? Those are ALL rules that people wanted to make.
“Who decides when life starts? Who decides that sperm is not a form of life and any form of stoping it from doing what was naturally intended for it is not murder?”
Pro-life reasoning is simple and accurate: It is a scientific fact (http://tinyurl.com/yfje8lq ) and basic common sense (what else would two human beings produce?) that a new human being is reproduced at fertilization. Seriously, go check out any mainstream embryology textbook. I’m too pro-science to be pro-choice. Based on the settled science, it is then simple moral reasoning that it is wrong to take the life of an innocent human being without proper justification, and that is what happens during 99% of abortions.
The situations surrounding abortions are psychologically complex (pressures on the mother to abort, economic concerns, etc.) but morally simple (you don’t kill unwanted humans outside the womb for those reasons, so you shouldn’t kill them inside the womb for those reasons). Their size, level of development, location and degree of dependency are not reasons to ignore their right to life. Arguments about “bodily autonomy” ignore the body destroyed in the abortion.
In other words, it is wrong to take the life of an innocent human being without proper justification. Abortion does that. Therefore, abortion is wrong.
“And is the author qualified to make these types of claims?”
That’s cute how you try to dismiss contrary views before you even read them.
“If you feel they are, where did they develop this knowledge of when life begins?”
I already shared that, but you went back into sound-bite mode – http://www.abort73.com/abortion/medical_testimony/
“Please give me non bias content to research.. Because I would love to learn more.”
Haha! Cute game. Anything that disagrees with your pro-abortion views will be dismissed as “bias,” yet oddly enough you haven’t applied your standard to your pro-abortion sound bites.
Don’t comment again until you thoroughly research those sites AND stop making fallacious statements about bias.
LikeLike
Based on your verbiage in your reply… You are extremely embedded in your ideals of this topic. Which I understand. I get this all the time when trying to have a calm thoughtful conversation. With words like “cute” and sentences like ” that’s a really bad argument”. Let me clarify a few things.
1. I am not pro abortion. I am pro-other people’s lives are not your concern.
2. We will not change each others minds on this topic, so I am not arguing. I am looking for a better understanding of where you are coming from and why you think the way you do.
3. I have been a strong proponent of helping young adolescents make better decisions prior to the conception of life.
I feel that this is a much better place to spend our resources and time. Not trying to tell people how to live there lives. A lot of Americans want less government in their lives, but want to be able to dictate a small number of people’s lives.
This will be my last post. And I appreciate they great conversation. And the sharing of resources.
I will read these and get to know the opposing view. Once again.
Thanks.
LikeLike
“I am pro-other people’s lives are not your concern.”
So if someone was killing your neighbor outside the womb you’d just mind your own business?
“Not trying to tell people how to live there lives.”
Your faux “mind your own business” philosophy ignores the human beings crushed and dismembered by abortions.
Yes, we want limited government, but government’s primary role is to protect innocent human lives. If you really believed what you are writing then you’d be going nuts over all the gov’t intrusion in our lives.
LikeLike
I guess I’m back at it here.
Hopefully I never see my neighbor in the womb.. But that comment is slightly beneath you. Your verbiage is highly nonsensical and way off in comparison. May I get a better understanding of what you are indicating in your last post.. Correct me if I am wrong, please. Painting a picture based off your description. I picture a fully developed baby, with arms legs all vital organs and 5 to 9 months matured being pulled from the womb and piece by piece dismembered… Sort of “Butcher in a horror movie” type of manner. Is this what you are trying to get me to believe?
I feel based on our previous conversations that we are both smarter than this. Let’s not loose our composure during this meaningful 2 sided discussion. It’s not us.
To our other discussion.. You can’t possibly believe that governments primary roll is to protect innocent lives. If this was the case we would say, “Please be as invasive as needed to protect us from what ever scares us” not the case. What about religiously motivated political ideals? This is a one sided government. The same as strictly scientific government takes away from what makes us human.. The ability to have heartfelt feelings. Making us all robots. If you really felt what you are preaching. You would see the world different. Not so narrow minded and one sided. It is starting to sound more like you are attempting to establish your point through anger and frustration and less like you are trying to help me understand why you believe what you do.
I strongly believe that the world has no business telling a women or a man what the can and cannot do with there bodies or their lives. This is a prime example of an establishment trying to take away our freedoms that so many have and do die for every day. I am not ok with loosing our freedoms because one group does not agree with another’s beliefs. That sounds a lot like what I have seen taking place around the world, primarily focused in the Middle East. A group of strong willed religiously motivated power hungry idealists telling us that what we believe is wrong and we should be punished for it.
Let me reiterate.. I do not agree with my freedom of belief being anyone else’s decision. That’s not what this country stands for and that’s not something I have fought for. To many lives have been lost so you can have your opinion, and be able to express your opinion. Just as long as it does not impede on “Your neighbors freedom”.
Would you like me to tell you that you win this debate? Or would you agree that this is a 2 sided conversation with a difference of opinion? Either way.. I don’t care. I literally just want to know your thoughts on the topics at hand. And I have definitely been able to, as I am sure you ha e as well, been able to conclude an opinion about your beliefs.
Thanks again.
LikeLike
Keep in mind, this is the same Hillary who recently tweeted
“Every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported.”
Does that include
Juanita Broaddrick
Paula Jones
Kathleen Willey
Liz Ward Gracen
LikeLiked by 1 person