Stan does a great job in Winging It: Let’s Talk Hunches in exposing how “Christian” Leftists use a selective “that’s just your hunch!” accusation whenever they don’t like a Bible passage you quote. He also addresses their lame “nothing to see here, folks!” attempt to deny that the sin of Sodom is homosexual behavior (the “Christian” Left insists that God iconically annihilated multiple cities for having bad manners).
The “Christian” Left tips their hands by never applying the “hunch” accusation to their fellow Leftists who (mis)quote their preferred scriptures with such confidence. Why aren’t those hunches as well?
And they tie themselves in knots with the Ezekiel thing. Just ask them if they think the book of Ezekiel is the word of God. [Awkward pause] If so, they need to account for the rest of what it says. If not, why are they cherry-picking that verse?
And do they not realize that God had decided to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah before the angels went there? They were going to burn whether they tried the homosexual rape thing or not.
Oh, and why do they ignore 2 Peter and Jude?
2 Peter 2:6–10 . . . if by turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah to ashes he condemned them to extinction, making them an example of what is going to happen to the ungodly; and if he rescued righteous Lot, greatly distressed by the sensual conduct of the wicked (for as that righteous man lived among them day after day, he was tormenting his righteous soul over their lawless deeds that he saw and heard); then the Lord knows how to rescue the godly from trials, and to keep the unrighteous under punishment until the day of judgment, and especially those who indulge in the lust of defiling passion and despise authority.
Jude 7 just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.