Hillary Clinton presents herself as a Christian but shows no fruit. From her pro-abortion and pro-LGBTQX extremism to her long list of scandals she is the prototype “Christian” Leftist.
Here’s a classic report when trusted journalist Brian Williams exposes Hillary’s fake story about being shot at in Bosnia.
As if we needed any more evidence that potential 2016 presidential nominee Hillary Clinton is not a moderate, it was announced today that EMILY’s List, an extreme pro-abortion organization, will be honoring her with one of their most cherished awards:
EMILY’s List, which works to elect Democratic women who support abortion rights, said Tuesday that Clinton would appear at its 30th anniversary awards gala in Washington on March 3. The former secretary of state will receive the group’s We Are EMILY Award to honor her leadership “as a fighter for women and families,” said Stephanie Schriock, the group’s president.
[…]Clinton’s pro-abortion agenda goes beyond accepting awards. In 1993, when she was attempting to transform the health care industry, she said that under her plan, abortion services “would be widely available.” Then, in 1999, she delivered a speech to NARAL, the National Abortion Rights Action League, in Washington, D.C., stating her goal of “keeping abortion safe, legal and rare into the next century.”
She’s just a regular person, right? High-flying Hillary outspent Romney 9:1 on private jets in 2008 cycle.
She uses good Judgment and would never sell political favors: In 2008, Hillary offered to make Edwards attorney general if he would quit and endorse her.
Then there was the time she protected a rapist by attacking the 12 yr. old victim. Why don’t feminists go nuts over that? It doesn’t sound like it was a “hard choice” for her to do it. This is a thousand times more of a “war on woman” than anything the media exaggerates for Republicans. If the media is forced to talk about this it will hurt her.
The Daily Beast’s Josh Rogoin took a break from his national-security beat and tracked down the victim in that crime, now 52, who alleges that Hillary Clinton did attack her as part of the defense, and much more. In the exclusive interview, Rogin reports the woman’s accusation that Hillary Clinton lied in court documents to portray her as a sex-crazed spoiled brat who threw herself at older men and then accused them of rape:
The victim’s allegation that Clinton smeared her following her rape is based on a May 1975 court affidavit written by Clinton on behalf of Thomas Alfred Taylor, one of the two alleged attackers, whom Clinton was appointed to defend.
“I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing,” Clinton, then named Hillary D. Rodham, wrote in the affidavit. “I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body. Also that she exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”
Clinton also wrote that a child psychologist told her that children in early adolescence “tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences,” especially when they come from “disorganized families, such as the complainant.”
The victim vigorously denied Clinton’s accusations and said there has never been any explanation of what Clinton was referring to in that affidavit. She claims she never accused anyone of attacking her before her rape.
“I’ve never said that about anyone. I don’t know why she said that. I have never made false allegations. I know she was lying,” she said. “I definitely didn’t see older men. I don’t know why Hillary put that in there and it makes me plumb mad.”
. . .
Addendum: It’s worth noting that the Free Beacon has been banned from the University of Arkansas library archives after making the audio of the interview public. That decision, Alana Goodman reports, was made by a donor to … Hillary Clinton.
Then there is this long list of serious scandals. I actually think the Travelgate issue is one of the worst, as it shows how she would gladly destroy innocent people to make herself look better. No one would have objected if she had just put her own people in place as a result of political spoils, but in the most hypocritical way possible she tried to make herself look nice by being vicious.