The ultimate Liberal tautology: You are racist for not voting for a black man and you are racist for voting for a black man

Alternate title: “Can a media personality say something more stupid than this? Probably not.”

A tautology is an essentially meaningless statement where all instances are true, such as, “It will rain today or it won’t.” I say without exaggeration that Janeane Garofalo’s version is that Republicans are racist for voting against a (half) black man (Obama) and they are racist for supporting Herman Cain.

It is obvious who the real racist is: Garofalo. She is so cynical that she’ll play the race card to manipulate people even though she has no evidence that Tea Partiers are racist for supporting Cain.

In an appearance on Wednesday night’s “Countdown with Keith Olbermann” on Current TV, Garofalo explained her theory.

“Herman Cain is probably well-liked by some of the Republicans because it hides the racist elements of the Republican Party, conservative movement and tea party movement,” Garofalo said.

“People like Karl Rove like to keep the racism very covert and so Herman Cain provides this great opportunity so he can say, ‘Look: This is not a racist anti-immigrant, anti-female, anti-gay movement. Look: We have a black man.’ And look he’s polling well and he won a straw poll.”

Note to Janeane: Please meditate on these facts . . .

  • Abortion rates in the black community are 3x that of whites. Liberals want taxpayer-funded abortions, which will only increase that ratio. Republicans oppose this. How does that fit in with your “Republicans are racist and Democrats are not” meme?
  • Democrats have had virtual monopolies on inner-city politics and education for over 50 years. How is that working out for black people?
  • Black unemployment has gone up dramatically under President Obama. Will another half-trillion of political payoffs help reduce that?

Via Garofalo: Cain’s rise in support proves Republican racism, or something « Hot Air.

4 thoughts on “The ultimate Liberal tautology: You are racist for not voting for a black man and you are racist for voting for a black man”

  1. There are two irrelevant commentators, Olbermann and Garofalo. Did anyone besides a few conservatives waiting for their stupidity to come forth watch at all? Neil, between your blog and my blog I think we nearly double their viewership. 🙂


  2. I shared this on f/b and one of my friends posted this YouTube video which I thought you’d enjoy. 🙂

    I’m still trying to figure out how Janeane Garafolo is in any way relevant to anybody or anything. Why do her opinions matter more than, say, mine? Because she can pretend to be somebody she’s not, and people pay her for that?


  3. Wow. An idiot interviewing another idiot. I wonder what Garofalo points to as proof of racism? I’m accused often by a certain troll at my blog, and by a false priest who thinks he’s totally down with the black experience after supposedly marrying a black woman. Yet, they never seem to come up with any proof that I am or even might be. Lots of assumptions in order to defend people like Obama and bad policies that purport to help black people but don’t.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s