I added a part 5 to the series at the last minute. There was a lot of good dialogue in the comments section and I thought a summary might be useful.
Parts 1-4 addressed specific problems with categories of pro-gay theological reasoning: Dismissing the Bible, misinterpreting the Bible and adding (alleged) personal revelations to the Bible.
Please be sure to read part 5 of 5, as it shows how pro-gay reasoning also falls apart collectively when applied to other passages.
Thanks for reading along. I realize the posts were loooooong. I tried to condense them as best I could, but I wanted something thorough.